MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083164194 · doi:10.1353/mdr.2006.0055

Mister Paradise and Other One-Act Plays, and: Candles to the Sun (review)

2006· article· en· W2083164194 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reeve Parker

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleArt historyParadiseArtHistoryPerformance artArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Mister Paradise and Other One-Act Plays, and: Candles to the Sun Brian Parker Tenessee Williams . Mister Paradise and Other One-Act Plays. Ed. Nicholas Moschovakis and David Roessel. Foreword Eli Wallach and Anne Jackson. New York: New Directions, 2005. Pp. xxxvi + 244. $15.95 (Pb). Tennessee Williams . Candles to the Sun. Ed. and Intro. Dan Isaac. Foreword William Jay Smith. New York: New Directions, 2004. Pp. xxxii + 117. $12.95 (Pb). One of the most interesting aspects of the recent surge in Tennessee Williams studies and performance has been the discovery of previously unpublished and, in some cases, unproduced plays from the early years of his career, before the debacle of Battle of Angels and The Glass Menagerie's success. The most spectacular of these recovered texts has been Not about Nightingales, a play concerning a prison scandal in 1938 that was edited by Allean Hale for New Directions in 1998 and immediately snapped up for very successful productions in London's West End and Broadway. Nightingales was one of five full-length plays known to have been performed during Williams' apprentice years, three more of which – Spring Storm, Stairs to the Roof, and Fugitive Kind (not to be confused with the film version of Battle of Angels) – have subsequently been published by New Directions and have received university productions. Candles to the Sun, which is the earliest of the five and almost certainly Williams' first full-length play, is now also available, edited by Dan Isaac, with a very interesting foreword by William Jay Smith, one of Williams' close friends from that period, who later became Poet Laureate of the United States. The play was begun at Memphis in the summer of 1935 as Williams recovered from a nervous breakdown [End Page 137] caused by his work at the International Shoe Company and was first performed in the auditorium of the Wednesday Club of St. Louis in March 1937, by a semi-professional company called the Mummers. The director of that group, Willard Holland, also played one of the leading roles – the charismatic union organizer Birmingham Red – and helped Williams shape the staged version of the play from a huge pile of typewritten pages of draft. A major difficultly in recovering all of these early works is Williams' maniacal method of composition. He was a speed typist who rarely planned what he was going to say but just jumped in and typed. As Dan Isaac explains in his textual notes for the edition, there are well over four-hundred pages of Candles to the Sun at the Humanities Research Center in Austin, Texas, representing drafts of at least four versions of the play, with The Lamp, Place in the Sun, and Candles in the Sun as alternative titles. Fortunately for Isaac, he was contacted as early as 1989 by Jane Garnett Carter, the actress who had created the role of the rebellious daughter Star, Williams' first female lead, who offered him a copy of the script as it was actually performed; and it is this script that has now been put into print, with a useful introduction and notes by Isaac, in addition to the foreword by Smith. Williams always had difficulty with plot construction, typically assembling his plays from discrete sections like a mosaic, so it is interesting to discover that he was enabled to make the leap from one-acts to a full-length play because Candles had originally been plotted by another playwright, Joseph Phelan Hollifield, who was a friend of Williams' grandfather. A title page for the version called The Lamp has both authors' names on it, plus a pencil note of explanation by Williams: "Hollifield finished the original one-act play from which the title and partly the idea of the play was derived. I am doing the writing on the present manuscript and he is contributing some material from Alabama." The exact extent of Hollifield's contribution to the full-length text performed in 1937 is unclear, but Isaac suggests that Williams wrote or rewrote most of the dialogue and I would speculate that what he probably developed most was the dynamics of a dysfunctional family, as distinct from the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchFrench-language works237,207