MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2085398437 · doi:10.1353/utq.2006.0086

Moving Targets: Writing with Intent, 1982-2004 (review)

2006· article· en· W2085398437 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sherrill Grace

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSensibilityHistoryPassionReading (process)Art historyLiteratureArtMedia studiesSociologyLawPsychologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Moving Targets: Writing with Intent, 1982-2004 Sherrill Grace (bio) Margaret Atwood. Moving Targets: Writing with Intent, 1982-2004Anansi. 422. $39.95 Reading this latest collection of Margaret Atwood's non-fiction has been like revisiting my past. With her usual intelligence and perception, Atwood has captured the times through which we have lived, in Canada and the wider world. From the fall of the Berlin Wall to the American invasion of Iraq, from the death of Marian Engel to the death of Carol Shields, from new work by Italo Calvino to Studs Terkel's latest volume, from Alabama to Beechy Island, from Afghanistan to Australia ... what has she not seen or read, where has she not been? And how can I capture the scope of her observations or the passion with which she writes about our times or the ways in which a comment, image, or fact conjures up the past for me? [End Page 403] Instead, I must single out just a few pieces that hit me hard and urge anyone interested in Atwood's work and life to read this volume with care. She provides us with fascinating glimpses into her process of researching and writing such novels as Alias Grace, The Blind Assassin, and Oryx and Crake, and along the way she reveals her literary preferences and influences and her acute political sensibility. But perhaps most important, she demonstrates her complex relation with her time and place, which may be rooted in Toronto but extends around the world. I will never understand how she does it all, the travelling, the novel and poetry writing, the speaking, while still producing the more occasional prose pieces collected here. Because of the personal tone and autobiographical information in many of these pieces, I feel close to the woman herself, as if getting to know her better. Among the essays that I will cherish are her commemorative ones about writers like Engel, Shields, Matt Cohen, Mordecai Richler, Timothy Findley, and Gwendolyn MacEwen. We have lost so many fine writers over the past two decades and, while I know that, it comes as a shock to reflect on this loss. I confess that her piece on Marian Engel moved me to tears, but there is also a deep wisdom in Atwood's comment that 'a dying person can be thought of as dying or living. Marian thought of herself as living.' And her reflections on a trip in the Arctic that included a stop at Beechy Island turn a private lived moment into the stuff of myth when Atwood celebrates MacEwen, then gathers up a pebble that she would later carry to Gwendolyn MacEwen Park in Toronto and bury so that 'somewhere in the heart of darkest Toronto, its exact location known only to me, there's a tiny piece of geology brought all the way from Beechy Island.' Yes, a tiny piece of geology and a huge piece of cultural memory that links the mid-nineteenth century with the early twenty-first century, Sir John Franklin and the North-West Passage with southern Canada, and Gwendolyn MacEwen and Margaret Atwood with us. Atwood concludes this essay with a quotation from MacEwen's poem about Franklin called Terror and Erebus: 'So I've followed you here ...' and so I have, so we have. But the essays in Moving Targets do not always appeal to memory and emotion. Some are hard-hitting warnings about the current mess of our world. The title of this volume is carefully chosen. Atwood's key targets are environmental degradation, religious fanaticism, political tyranny, and war, and while she comments on these all too familiar phenomena throughout the volume the four most politically astute pieces are 'Napoleon's Two Biggest Mistakes,' 'Letter to America,' 'Writing Oryx and Crake,' and 'George Orwell: Some Personal Connections.' History, Atwood reminds us, proves that 'when a whole population hates you, and hates you fanatically, it's difficult to rule,' and Orwell warned us about state surveillance, which Atwood notes is 'back again with a vengeance' after 9/11. But will those in power read these essays? I don't know, but I urge [End Page 404] you to...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,092

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0280,016

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,180
Écart entre enseignants0,171 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionTravaux en français237 207