MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085398437 · doi:10.1353/utq.2006.0086

Moving Targets: Writing with Intent, 1982-2004 (review)

2006· article· en· W2085398437 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sherrill Grace

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensibilityHistoryPassionReading (process)Art historyLiteratureArtMedia studiesSociologyLawPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Moving Targets: Writing with Intent, 1982-2004 Sherrill Grace (bio) Margaret Atwood. Moving Targets: Writing with Intent, 1982-2004Anansi. 422. $39.95 Reading this latest collection of Margaret Atwood's non-fiction has been like revisiting my past. With her usual intelligence and perception, Atwood has captured the times through which we have lived, in Canada and the wider world. From the fall of the Berlin Wall to the American invasion of Iraq, from the death of Marian Engel to the death of Carol Shields, from new work by Italo Calvino to Studs Terkel's latest volume, from Alabama to Beechy Island, from Afghanistan to Australia ... what has she not seen or read, where has she not been? And how can I capture the scope of her observations or the passion with which she writes about our times or the ways in which a comment, image, or fact conjures up the past for me? [End Page 403] Instead, I must single out just a few pieces that hit me hard and urge anyone interested in Atwood's work and life to read this volume with care. She provides us with fascinating glimpses into her process of researching and writing such novels as Alias Grace, The Blind Assassin, and Oryx and Crake, and along the way she reveals her literary preferences and influences and her acute political sensibility. But perhaps most important, she demonstrates her complex relation with her time and place, which may be rooted in Toronto but extends around the world. I will never understand how she does it all, the travelling, the novel and poetry writing, the speaking, while still producing the more occasional prose pieces collected here. Because of the personal tone and autobiographical information in many of these pieces, I feel close to the woman herself, as if getting to know her better. Among the essays that I will cherish are her commemorative ones about writers like Engel, Shields, Matt Cohen, Mordecai Richler, Timothy Findley, and Gwendolyn MacEwen. We have lost so many fine writers over the past two decades and, while I know that, it comes as a shock to reflect on this loss. I confess that her piece on Marian Engel moved me to tears, but there is also a deep wisdom in Atwood's comment that 'a dying person can be thought of as dying or living. Marian thought of herself as living.' And her reflections on a trip in the Arctic that included a stop at Beechy Island turn a private lived moment into the stuff of myth when Atwood celebrates MacEwen, then gathers up a pebble that she would later carry to Gwendolyn MacEwen Park in Toronto and bury so that 'somewhere in the heart of darkest Toronto, its exact location known only to me, there's a tiny piece of geology brought all the way from Beechy Island.' Yes, a tiny piece of geology and a huge piece of cultural memory that links the mid-nineteenth century with the early twenty-first century, Sir John Franklin and the North-West Passage with southern Canada, and Gwendolyn MacEwen and Margaret Atwood with us. Atwood concludes this essay with a quotation from MacEwen's poem about Franklin called Terror and Erebus: 'So I've followed you here ...' and so I have, so we have. But the essays in Moving Targets do not always appeal to memory and emotion. Some are hard-hitting warnings about the current mess of our world. The title of this volume is carefully chosen. Atwood's key targets are environmental degradation, religious fanaticism, political tyranny, and war, and while she comments on these all too familiar phenomena throughout the volume the four most politically astute pieces are 'Napoleon's Two Biggest Mistakes,' 'Letter to America,' 'Writing Oryx and Crake,' and 'George Orwell: Some Personal Connections.' History, Atwood reminds us, proves that 'when a whole population hates you, and hates you fanatically, it's difficult to rule,' and Orwell warned us about state surveillance, which Atwood notes is 'back again with a vengeance' after 9/11. But will those in power read these essays? I don't know, but I urge [End Page 404] you to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207