Feasibility of boron fertilization for yield, seed quality and B uptake of canola in northeastern Saskatchewan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
(Brassica napus L . and B. rapa L.) grown on the sandy soils of northeastern Saskatchewan has been observed to exhibit symptoms similar to B deficiency, and soil testing laboratories often recommend B fertilization on these soils. The objective of the present study was to determine if yield, seed quality and diseases of canola are related to different rates, times and methods of B fertilization on some northeastern Saskatchewan soils (Gray Luvisol) expected to be B deficient. Two growth chamber and seven field experiments were conducted in 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000. In the field experiments, the treatments included application of B fertilizers as broadcast followed by incorporation (1 to 4 kg B ha-1) prior to seeding, seedrow placement at seeding (0.5 to 2 kg B ha-1) and foliar spray at 10–20% bloom stage (0.25 and 0.50 kg B ha-1) plus a zero B control treatment. In the growth chamber experiments, rates of 1 to 3 mg B kg-1 soil were tested. In the field experiments, seed and straw yields tended to increase in very few of the treatments, with significant increases from incorporated B fertilization at one site for seed and at three sites for straw. The protein content in the seed was significantly increased by B fertilization at one site, while oil content in the seed was not influenced by B fertilization in any field experiment. The B fertilization treatments either increased or tended to increase the B concentration and uptake of B in seed and straw in most cases, with significant contrasts for control vs. incorporated B and seedrow B methods of applications in many cases. The increase in B concentration and uptake of B was usually greater in straw than in seed. Among the methods of B application, the effectiveness of B application could be considered as incorporated B > seedrow B > foliar B. Averaged across the sites and two treatments for each application method for example, B uptake in seed increased by 6.7, 3.8 and 1.0 g ha-1 with incorporated, seedrow and foliar B treatments, respectively. Corresponding methods showed an increase of B uptake in straw by 46, 33 and 23 g ha-1. Disease levels were low for sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotorum) and low to moderate for blackleg (Leptosphaeria maculans) and alternaria pod spot (Alternaria brassica and A. raphani), and B fertilizer treatments had no impact on the amount or severity of infection for these diseases. In the growth chamber experiments, B fertilization tended to increase the yield of seed and straw (up to 13%) in both soils, with significant contrasts for 0 k g B ha-1 vs. 1, 2 and 3 kg B ha-1 in many cases. In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest that canola rarely responds to B fertilization in field conditions on soils suspected to be B deficient, but canola response to B was influenced by the method of B application. Key words: Boron concentration and uptake, boron fertilizer, canola (Brassica napus L. and Brassica rapa L.), oil and proteincontent, yield
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».