MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2085932983 · doi:10.1353/ohh.2013.0017

A House in Search of a Home: A Contextual History of the Founding of the Cleveland Play House

2013· article· en· W2085932983 sur OpenAlex
Jeffrey Ullom

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOhio history · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueArchitecture, Design, and Social History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHouse callHouse of RepresentativesHouse mouseGreen houseArtGerontologyHistoryArchaeologyPolitical scienceMedicineLawBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A House in Search of a Home:A Contextual History of the Founding of the Cleveland Play House Jeffrey Ullom (bio) Karen Zacarias became a part of American theater history on May 1, 2011. Following the conclusion of her play Legacy of Light, patrons filed out of the Cleveland Play House's Drury Theatre for the final time, leaving behind an eighty-four-year-old building filled with memories, accomplishments, and problems. The massive four-theater, 295,000-square-foot complex located on Euclid Avenue became too much of a financial burden for the Cleveland Play House to bear, requiring the nonprofit organization to budget $1 million each year for maintenance, never mind the backlog of $4 million in repairs that had gone ignored for years.1 Having sold its 11.29-acre site to the neighboring Cleveland Clinic, the Cleveland Play House moved seventy blocks west, into a new performing arts complex—coincidentally named Playhouse Square—where the nation's longest-running professional theater opened its new performance space four months later. While audiences marveled at the ornate yet intimate 514-seat auditorium, most patrons were unaware that the Allen Theatre, in fact, was quite old, constructed in 1921 as a movie house and later converted into a theater before being left vacant.2 This is not the first time that the Cleveland Play House claimed an [End Page 70] abandoned space as its home; in its earliest years, the organization found itself moving from place to place to survive. As it approaches its centennial anniversary in 2015, the Cleveland Play House's move downtown is cause not only to celebrate its future but also to explore its past and chart the difficulties that the founding members overcame in establishing the famous institution. The Cleveland Play House deserves recognition not only as the longest-running professional theater in the country but also because it is the only theater from the era to have survived. Joining the Toy Theatre in Boston and the Little Theatre in Chicago as part of the little theater movement in the 1910s, the Cleveland Play House's commitment to offering "art theater" (noncommercial) fare blazed a trail for other theaters in the 1920s and 1930s to follow. While many cities in Ohio boasted rentable performance houses for touring productions and smaller theater companies dedicated to offering popular plays or vaudeville shows, institutions modeled after the Cleveland Play House did not appear until nearly a decade later, making the founding of this type of theater even more remarkable.3 Surprisingly, insightful research into the origins of Cleveland Play House has been neglected by every publication referring to the institution's beginnings, including Joseph Wesley Zeigler's Regional Theatre and Cleveland's own legendary newspaper, the Cleveland Plain Dealer.4 When referring to the creation of the theater (often in articles marking an anniversary), the Cleveland Plain Dealer simply repeats a standard narrative first described in a book written by a participant in the Cleveland Play House's earliest endeavors. Julia McCune Flory, wife of the organization's first president and author of one of the earliest histories of the Cleveland Play House, recalled the events leading to the founding of the Cleveland Play House, unknowingly providing a brief history that would remain unexamined for decades: "In the early fall of 1915, Charles and Minerva Brooks invited eight friends to meet in their drawing room at 1598 East 115th Street to discuss the forming of an Art Theatre. Those present at this first meeting were Charles and Minerva Brooks, Raymond O'Neil, Ernest and Katharine Angell, Henry Hohnhorst and his wife Anna, George Clisbee, Grace Treat, and Marthena [End Page 71] Barrie."5 While Flory's account is certainly sufficient in listing the key participants, it remains an overly simplistic narrative. Scholars who research the founding of arts institutions know that such effortless descriptions gloss over the various struggles and challenges that every organization faces in order to define its own aesthetics and form a cohesive and effective group. The context Flory fails to record in her brief assessment prohibits a complete understanding of the individuals involved with this landmark artistic endeavor. Even though the Cleveland Play...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,853
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,825

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,163 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle