MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2085932983 · doi:10.1353/ohh.2013.0017

A House in Search of a Home: A Contextual History of the Founding of the Cleveland Play House

2013· article· en· W2085932983 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeffrey Ullom

Bibliographic record

VenueOhio history · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture, Design, and Social History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHouse callHouse of RepresentativesHouse mouseGreen houseArtGerontologyHistoryArchaeologyPolitical scienceMedicineLawBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A House in Search of a Home:A Contextual History of the Founding of the Cleveland Play House Jeffrey Ullom (bio) Karen Zacarias became a part of American theater history on May 1, 2011. Following the conclusion of her play Legacy of Light, patrons filed out of the Cleveland Play House's Drury Theatre for the final time, leaving behind an eighty-four-year-old building filled with memories, accomplishments, and problems. The massive four-theater, 295,000-square-foot complex located on Euclid Avenue became too much of a financial burden for the Cleveland Play House to bear, requiring the nonprofit organization to budget $1 million each year for maintenance, never mind the backlog of $4 million in repairs that had gone ignored for years.1 Having sold its 11.29-acre site to the neighboring Cleveland Clinic, the Cleveland Play House moved seventy blocks west, into a new performing arts complex—coincidentally named Playhouse Square—where the nation's longest-running professional theater opened its new performance space four months later. While audiences marveled at the ornate yet intimate 514-seat auditorium, most patrons were unaware that the Allen Theatre, in fact, was quite old, constructed in 1921 as a movie house and later converted into a theater before being left vacant.2 This is not the first time that the Cleveland Play House claimed an [End Page 70] abandoned space as its home; in its earliest years, the organization found itself moving from place to place to survive. As it approaches its centennial anniversary in 2015, the Cleveland Play House's move downtown is cause not only to celebrate its future but also to explore its past and chart the difficulties that the founding members overcame in establishing the famous institution. The Cleveland Play House deserves recognition not only as the longest-running professional theater in the country but also because it is the only theater from the era to have survived. Joining the Toy Theatre in Boston and the Little Theatre in Chicago as part of the little theater movement in the 1910s, the Cleveland Play House's commitment to offering "art theater" (noncommercial) fare blazed a trail for other theaters in the 1920s and 1930s to follow. While many cities in Ohio boasted rentable performance houses for touring productions and smaller theater companies dedicated to offering popular plays or vaudeville shows, institutions modeled after the Cleveland Play House did not appear until nearly a decade later, making the founding of this type of theater even more remarkable.3 Surprisingly, insightful research into the origins of Cleveland Play House has been neglected by every publication referring to the institution's beginnings, including Joseph Wesley Zeigler's Regional Theatre and Cleveland's own legendary newspaper, the Cleveland Plain Dealer.4 When referring to the creation of the theater (often in articles marking an anniversary), the Cleveland Plain Dealer simply repeats a standard narrative first described in a book written by a participant in the Cleveland Play House's earliest endeavors. Julia McCune Flory, wife of the organization's first president and author of one of the earliest histories of the Cleveland Play House, recalled the events leading to the founding of the Cleveland Play House, unknowingly providing a brief history that would remain unexamined for decades: "In the early fall of 1915, Charles and Minerva Brooks invited eight friends to meet in their drawing room at 1598 East 115th Street to discuss the forming of an Art Theatre. Those present at this first meeting were Charles and Minerva Brooks, Raymond O'Neil, Ernest and Katharine Angell, Henry Hohnhorst and his wife Anna, George Clisbee, Grace Treat, and Marthena [End Page 71] Barrie."5 While Flory's account is certainly sufficient in listing the key participants, it remains an overly simplistic narrative. Scholars who research the founding of arts institutions know that such effortless descriptions gloss over the various struggles and challenges that every organization faces in order to define its own aesthetics and form a cohesive and effective group. The context Flory fails to record in her brief assessment prohibits a complete understanding of the individuals involved with this landmark artistic endeavor. Even though the Cleveland Play...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOhio historySame topicArchitecture, Design, and Social HistoryFrench-language works237,207