MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2086814699 · doi:10.3821/145.5.cpj202

Provinces and territories agree to work together to purchase generic drugs and to expand use of bulk purchasing for brand-name drugs

2012· article· en· W2086814699 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kathie Lynas

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiquePharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPurchasingProcurementBusinessBiddingMedical prescriptionBrand namesHealth careWork (physics)MarketingEconomicsEconomic growthMedicineEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Canada's provincial and territorial premiers have announced plans for a national competitive bidding process to purchase generic drugs and to expand use of group pricing for brand-name drugs. The announcement was made on July 26, 2012, during a meeting of the Council of the Federation in Halifax. Bulk purchasing for generics has become a necessity, according to a report from the Council's Working Group on Health Care Innovation. “Canadian prices on 64 generic prescription drugs are 90% higher than American prices and that's the gap were going to seek to close,” Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall said at a July 26 news conference; he co-wrote the report with Prince Edward Island Premier Robert Ghiz. The provinces and territories — with the exception of Quebec — will begin by jointly purchasing 3 to 5 generic drugs, with prices established through competitive tendering. These pharmaceuticals are to be identified in the fall and the bulk purchasing is to begin in the spring of 2013. Pharmacists support measures to ensure the financial sustainability of health care but they have concerns about bulk purchasing, says Dr. Jeff Poston, executive director of the Canadian Pharmacists Association (CPhA). “Our concern is the risks to the supply chain that get created through competitive tendering, where you can end up with a sole supplier and potential shortage issues, says Dr. Poston. Noting that governments have already significantly reduced generic drug costs through new pricing policies, he says the focus on further reductions is somewhat misplaced and short-sighted. “They need to focus more on patient care and outcomes from drug therapy. This preoccupation with price neglects the need for investment and for improving safety and quality — ultimately saving money in the broader health care system.” National bulk purchasing with a tendering process is the best approach for generic drugs, according to Marc- Andre Gagnon, assistant professor at the School of Public Policy and Administration at Carleton University in Ottawa and an expert adviser with EvidenceNetwork.ca. “Many countries are purchasing in this way and they manage to get amazing rebates,” says Dr. Gagnon. “I am skeptical, however, about the premiers' plans to accelerate and expand bulk purchasing of brand-name drugs. That's where the real money is — generic drugs are only about 25% of drug expenditures.” In September 2010, the provinces and territories announced a pan-Canadian purchasing alliance to purchase the most expensive brand-name drugs. Since that time, Dr. Gagnon points out, only 2 products have been purchased that way. Achieving significant savings on brand-name drugs will be very challenging through joint purchasing alone, he says. For the past few years, the brand-name pharmaceutical companies have employed a global pricing strategy, in which they establish an “official price” for prescription drugs and negotiate rebates for individual purchasers. They did this after the US government agreed that its Medicare plan would always pay the official price, so there is an incentive to keep that price artificially high, explains Dr. Gagnon. “In Canada, most provinces have focused on standalone agreements for costly brand-name drugs, in which they list the official price on the formulary but secure confidential rebates for the public drug plan,” he says. “As soon as it is listed in a formulary, it is listed in every private drug plan in the province — and they don't benefit from the rebates. And patients paying out of pocket also have to pay the full official price.” Patients covered by the public plans also have co-payments and deductibles based on the official price. “It also puts smaller provinces at a disadvantage because they don't have the populations to secure the same savings as the larger provinces,” he adds. “There is a huge problem in terms of equity here between provinces.” It appears that the provinces and territories seek to negotiate on the official price of the drug, says Dr. Gagnon. “With the global pricing strategy, drug companies will be very reluctant to touch the official price. I don't think this is the best way to get high rebates.” The only way to secure significant savings on brandname drugs, he says, is to implement a national pharmacare program. He points to New Zealand, where the brand-name pharmaceuticals are 51% of the cost of those in Canada. “In New Zealand, the reason it works properly is that they do have a national pharmacare program, so when they purchase drugs they do so for all New Zealanders. Under a national program, we can eliminate playing of one province against the others. And the drug cost savings would be enough to actually fund the national drug plan.”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,979
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,176

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,003
Communication savante0,0060,002
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0530,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,077
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du CanadaMême sujetPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyTravaux en français237 207