MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086814699 · doi:10.3821/145.5.cpj202

Provinces and territories agree to work together to purchase generic drugs and to expand use of bulk purchasing for brand-name drugs

2012· article· en· W2086814699 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kathie Lynas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicPharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurchasingProcurementBusinessBiddingMedical prescriptionBrand namesHealth careWork (physics)MarketingEconomicsEconomic growthMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada's provincial and territorial premiers have announced plans for a national competitive bidding process to purchase generic drugs and to expand use of group pricing for brand-name drugs. The announcement was made on July 26, 2012, during a meeting of the Council of the Federation in Halifax. Bulk purchasing for generics has become a necessity, according to a report from the Council's Working Group on Health Care Innovation. “Canadian prices on 64 generic prescription drugs are 90% higher than American prices and that's the gap were going to seek to close,” Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall said at a July 26 news conference; he co-wrote the report with Prince Edward Island Premier Robert Ghiz. The provinces and territories — with the exception of Quebec — will begin by jointly purchasing 3 to 5 generic drugs, with prices established through competitive tendering. These pharmaceuticals are to be identified in the fall and the bulk purchasing is to begin in the spring of 2013. Pharmacists support measures to ensure the financial sustainability of health care but they have concerns about bulk purchasing, says Dr. Jeff Poston, executive director of the Canadian Pharmacists Association (CPhA). “Our concern is the risks to the supply chain that get created through competitive tendering, where you can end up with a sole supplier and potential shortage issues, says Dr. Poston. Noting that governments have already significantly reduced generic drug costs through new pricing policies, he says the focus on further reductions is somewhat misplaced and short-sighted. “They need to focus more on patient care and outcomes from drug therapy. This preoccupation with price neglects the need for investment and for improving safety and quality — ultimately saving money in the broader health care system.” National bulk purchasing with a tendering process is the best approach for generic drugs, according to Marc- Andre Gagnon, assistant professor at the School of Public Policy and Administration at Carleton University in Ottawa and an expert adviser with EvidenceNetwork.ca. “Many countries are purchasing in this way and they manage to get amazing rebates,” says Dr. Gagnon. “I am skeptical, however, about the premiers' plans to accelerate and expand bulk purchasing of brand-name drugs. That's where the real money is — generic drugs are only about 25% of drug expenditures.” In September 2010, the provinces and territories announced a pan-Canadian purchasing alliance to purchase the most expensive brand-name drugs. Since that time, Dr. Gagnon points out, only 2 products have been purchased that way. Achieving significant savings on brand-name drugs will be very challenging through joint purchasing alone, he says. For the past few years, the brand-name pharmaceutical companies have employed a global pricing strategy, in which they establish an “official price” for prescription drugs and negotiate rebates for individual purchasers. They did this after the US government agreed that its Medicare plan would always pay the official price, so there is an incentive to keep that price artificially high, explains Dr. Gagnon. “In Canada, most provinces have focused on standalone agreements for costly brand-name drugs, in which they list the official price on the formulary but secure confidential rebates for the public drug plan,” he says. “As soon as it is listed in a formulary, it is listed in every private drug plan in the province — and they don't benefit from the rebates. And patients paying out of pocket also have to pay the full official price.” Patients covered by the public plans also have co-payments and deductibles based on the official price. “It also puts smaller provinces at a disadvantage because they don't have the populations to secure the same savings as the larger provinces,” he adds. “There is a huge problem in terms of equity here between provinces.” It appears that the provinces and territories seek to negotiate on the official price of the drug, says Dr. Gagnon. “With the global pricing strategy, drug companies will be very reluctant to touch the official price. I don't think this is the best way to get high rebates.” The only way to secure significant savings on brandname drugs, he says, is to implement a national pharmacare program. He points to New Zealand, where the brand-name pharmaceuticals are 51% of the cost of those in Canada. “In New Zealand, the reason it works properly is that they do have a national pharmacare program, so when they purchase drugs they do so for all New Zealanders. Under a national program, we can eliminate playing of one province against the others. And the drug cost savings would be enough to actually fund the national drug plan.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du CanadaSame topicPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyFrench-language works237,207