The Virgin of Chartres: Making History through Liturgy and the Arts (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Virgin of Chartres: Making History through Liturgy and the Arts James Grier The Virgin of Chartres: Making History through Liturgy and the Arts. By Margot E. Fassler. (New Haven: Yale University Press. 2010. Pp. xiii, 612. $55.00. ISBN 978-0-300-11088-3.) The magnificent cathedral of Chartres, dedicated to the Virgin, needs no introduction to most medievalists. Those who have made the pilgrimage to Chartres cannot fail to feel awe at the sight of the edifice and its domination of the wheatfields on the Beauce plateau, its towering western façade, and the soaring interior—a place of mystery, peace, and grace. Some of that mystery [End Page 98] extends to large portions of the cathedral’s medieval history because of the unfortunate destruction, in the Allied bombing on May 26, 1944, of many of the holdings of the city’s Bibliothèque municipale. Photographic records and inventories of some medieval manuscripts survive, but much irretrievably perished. Margot Fassler attempts to penetrate some of the mystery through her analysis of the cathedral’s history and the ways in which its clerics shaped that history through their celebration of the liturgy and the design of the space in which the liturgy took place. Fassler begins by situating the cathedral, the Virgin, and the principal relic—the tunic said to have been worn by Mary during the birth of Jesus— in the social and political history of the central Middle Ages. Viking raids; the struggles for power among the Carolingians and their successors; and finally the emergence of the comital family of the Thibaudians, linked maritally in the twelfth century with the royal houses of both England and France, all take turns on the stage at Chartres. Throughout, the intercessory power of Mary and her relic, together with the church that housed it, play central roles in the drama. Within this context, then, the author shows how the liturgy that came to be celebrated at the cathedral shaped and retold history, biblical history, the life of Mary and Jesus, and the history of the city and the cathedral itself. The central focus of the book occupies its third and fourth sections, where Fassler recounts the rebuilding of the cathedral in the twelfth century, detailing the contributions of successive bishops and lay patrons (conveniently summarized in tabular form in appendix H, pp. 450–53). She provides a critical analysis of the architecture and its decoration, showing how the physical setting interacted with the liturgical ceremonies that took place in and around it to reshape and reinterpret the history that they, the decorative and liturgical programs, mutually presented. The many photographic illustrations included admirably supplement the discussion. As a kind of running counterbalance to this intensive analysis, the author presents, like a series of vignettes throughout the book, the texts of prominent chants in the liturgy, scrutinizing their internal meaning and their role in liturgical practices at the cathedral, all complemented by an anthology of some of the most important chants sung there (appendix D, pp. 387–419). Another useful appendix (A, pp. 369–75) lists the cathedral’s musical and liturgical books. This book represents the synthesis of an enormous amount of material from social and political history through architecture and the decorative arts to the liturgy and its constituent music. The reader emerges with a much clearer idea of the history of the city and the cathedral during this tumultuous period, but especially of the way its clerics preserved and reshaped that history in the cathedral’s decoration, and especially in its re-enactment during the celebration of the liturgy. [End Page 99] James Grier University of Western Ontario Copyright © 2012 The Catholic University of America Press
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».