MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087091194 · doi:10.1353/cat.2012.0040

The Virgin of Chartres: Making History through Liturgy and the Arts (review)

2012· article· en· W2087091194 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James Grier

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiturgyArtPower (physics)The artsPoliticsMiddle AgesClassicsArt historyHistoryAncient historyArchaeologyVisual artsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Virgin of Chartres: Making History through Liturgy and the Arts James Grier The Virgin of Chartres: Making History through Liturgy and the Arts. By Margot E. Fassler. (New Haven: Yale University Press. 2010. Pp. xiii, 612. $55.00. ISBN 978-0-300-11088-3.) The magnificent cathedral of Chartres, dedicated to the Virgin, needs no introduction to most medievalists. Those who have made the pilgrimage to Chartres cannot fail to feel awe at the sight of the edifice and its domination of the wheatfields on the Beauce plateau, its towering western façade, and the soaring interior—a place of mystery, peace, and grace. Some of that mystery [End Page 98] extends to large portions of the cathedral’s medieval history because of the unfortunate destruction, in the Allied bombing on May 26, 1944, of many of the holdings of the city’s Bibliothèque municipale. Photographic records and inventories of some medieval manuscripts survive, but much irretrievably perished. Margot Fassler attempts to penetrate some of the mystery through her analysis of the cathedral’s history and the ways in which its clerics shaped that history through their celebration of the liturgy and the design of the space in which the liturgy took place. Fassler begins by situating the cathedral, the Virgin, and the principal relic—the tunic said to have been worn by Mary during the birth of Jesus— in the social and political history of the central Middle Ages. Viking raids; the struggles for power among the Carolingians and their successors; and finally the emergence of the comital family of the Thibaudians, linked maritally in the twelfth century with the royal houses of both England and France, all take turns on the stage at Chartres. Throughout, the intercessory power of Mary and her relic, together with the church that housed it, play central roles in the drama. Within this context, then, the author shows how the liturgy that came to be celebrated at the cathedral shaped and retold history, biblical history, the life of Mary and Jesus, and the history of the city and the cathedral itself. The central focus of the book occupies its third and fourth sections, where Fassler recounts the rebuilding of the cathedral in the twelfth century, detailing the contributions of successive bishops and lay patrons (conveniently summarized in tabular form in appendix H, pp. 450–53). She provides a critical analysis of the architecture and its decoration, showing how the physical setting interacted with the liturgical ceremonies that took place in and around it to reshape and reinterpret the history that they, the decorative and liturgical programs, mutually presented. The many photographic illustrations included admirably supplement the discussion. As a kind of running counterbalance to this intensive analysis, the author presents, like a series of vignettes throughout the book, the texts of prominent chants in the liturgy, scrutinizing their internal meaning and their role in liturgical practices at the cathedral, all complemented by an anthology of some of the most important chants sung there (appendix D, pp. 387–419). Another useful appendix (A, pp. 369–75) lists the cathedral’s musical and liturgical books. This book represents the synthesis of an enormous amount of material from social and political history through architecture and the decorative arts to the liturgy and its constituent music. The reader emerges with a much clearer idea of the history of the city and the cathedral during this tumultuous period, but especially of the way its clerics preserved and reshaped that history in the cathedral’s decoration, and especially in its re-enactment during the celebration of the liturgy. [End Page 99] James Grier University of Western Ontario Copyright © 2012 The Catholic University of America Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œCatholic historical reviewSame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207