An Innovative Approach to the Primary Surgical Delay Procedure for Pedicle TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sir: The preliminary delay of the pedicle transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap through ligation of the inferior epigastric vessels has been shown to augment the vascular supply and decrease ischemic flap complications.1,2 Several surgeons have developed minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques to minimize morbidity while maximizing flap outcomes.2–4 However, the laparoscopic techniques described have only addressed the deep inferior epigastric vessels.2–5 This report describes our laparoscopic technique designed to ligate both the superficial and deep inferior epigastric vessels simultaneously. Our preliminary flap delay procedure is often performed in conjunction with a sentinel lymph node biopsy by our general surgery colleagues or a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy by the gynecology team. After induction of general anesthesia, the abdomen is prepared and draped in routine sterile fashion. Entrance into the peritoneal cavity is obtained by means of Veress needle insertion followed by trocar placement at the level of the umbilicus (Fig. 1). Pneumoperitoneum is established, and using a 30-degree laparoscope, initial examination of the intraabdominal cavity is performed to rule out the presence of iatrogenic injury or metastatic processes. With the patient in steep Trendelenburg position, the left and right internal inguinal rings are identified followed by identification of the deep inferior epigastric vessels at the superior medial aspect of the internal inguinal ring. The superficial inferior epigastric vessels are then identified by transillumination. Once both deep and superficial vessels are identified, a stab wound is made in the skin just over this area. A Vicryl-loaded Endoclose needle device (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, N.J.) is then introduced into the peritoneal cavity first medial and then lateral to the superficial and deep vessels (Fig. 1). The ligature is tied extraabdominally, with the knot placed at the fascial level, thereby ligating both the superficial and deep inferior epigastric vessels. The procedure is then repeated on the contralateral side.Fig. 1.: Illustration of the trocar sites used to laparoscopically ligate both the superficial and deep epigastric vessels. The laparoscope is inserted at the level of the umbilicus. The Endoclose device is inserted at a site near the pubic rami over the superficial inferior epigastric vessels. The site that is superior to the umbilicus and lateral to the rectus sheath can be used as an additional port when simultaneous ligation of the deep and superficial epigastric vessels cannot be achieved.When the superficial and deep inferior epigastric vessels are not close enough to allow for simultaneous ligation, they are approached separately. This requires placement of an additional 5-mm working port lateral to the rectus muscle above the level of the umbilicus (Fig. 1). This additional port facilitates introduction of the LigaSure V 5-mm sealer/divider (Covidien, Boulder, Col.) to fuse and ligate the deep inferior epigastric vessels. After ensuring hemostasis, the ports are removed and incisions are closed in the usual fashion. When compared with the open procedure, the laparoscopic delay described here has resulted in significantly decreased abdominal tissue morbidity and has maintained improved flap outcomes. It avoids large incisions; wound complications such as seromas; and edematous, friable tissue, which are complications frequently encountered with the open delay technique. Our technique also addresses both the superficial and deep inferior epigastric vessels, thereby providing a potentially larger, more reliable skin paddle. Nita Nair, M.D. Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, Mich. Dunya M. Atisha, M.D. Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, Mich. Department of Surgery University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City, Iowa Rachel Streu, M.D., M.S. Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical Center Department of Surgery St. Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor, Mich. E. Dale Collins, M.D., M.S. Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery Dartmouth Medical School Lebanon, N.H. Kathleen Diehl, M.D. Section of Surgical Oncology Department of Surgery Mark Pearlman, M.D. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amy K. Alderman, M.D., M.P.H. Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, Mich. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial or commercial interests related to this research. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».