MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087461115 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181d47019

An Innovative Approach to the Primary Surgical Delay Procedure for Pedicle TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction

2010· letter· en· W2087461115 on OpenAlexaff
Nita Nair, Dunya Atisha, Rachel Streu, E. Dale Collins, Kathleen M. Diehl, Mark D. Pearlman, Amy K. Alderman

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsNorthern Alberta Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryVeress needlePneumoperitoneumUmbilicus (mollusc)AbdomenLaparoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir: The preliminary delay of the pedicle transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap through ligation of the inferior epigastric vessels has been shown to augment the vascular supply and decrease ischemic flap complications.1,2 Several surgeons have developed minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques to minimize morbidity while maximizing flap outcomes.2–4 However, the laparoscopic techniques described have only addressed the deep inferior epigastric vessels.2–5 This report describes our laparoscopic technique designed to ligate both the superficial and deep inferior epigastric vessels simultaneously. Our preliminary flap delay procedure is often performed in conjunction with a sentinel lymph node biopsy by our general surgery colleagues or a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy by the gynecology team. After induction of general anesthesia, the abdomen is prepared and draped in routine sterile fashion. Entrance into the peritoneal cavity is obtained by means of Veress needle insertion followed by trocar placement at the level of the umbilicus (Fig. 1). Pneumoperitoneum is established, and using a 30-degree laparoscope, initial examination of the intraabdominal cavity is performed to rule out the presence of iatrogenic injury or metastatic processes. With the patient in steep Trendelenburg position, the left and right internal inguinal rings are identified followed by identification of the deep inferior epigastric vessels at the superior medial aspect of the internal inguinal ring. The superficial inferior epigastric vessels are then identified by transillumination. Once both deep and superficial vessels are identified, a stab wound is made in the skin just over this area. A Vicryl-loaded Endoclose needle device (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, N.J.) is then introduced into the peritoneal cavity first medial and then lateral to the superficial and deep vessels (Fig. 1). The ligature is tied extraabdominally, with the knot placed at the fascial level, thereby ligating both the superficial and deep inferior epigastric vessels. The procedure is then repeated on the contralateral side.Fig. 1.: Illustration of the trocar sites used to laparoscopically ligate both the superficial and deep epigastric vessels. The laparoscope is inserted at the level of the umbilicus. The Endoclose device is inserted at a site near the pubic rami over the superficial inferior epigastric vessels. The site that is superior to the umbilicus and lateral to the rectus sheath can be used as an additional port when simultaneous ligation of the deep and superficial epigastric vessels cannot be achieved.When the superficial and deep inferior epigastric vessels are not close enough to allow for simultaneous ligation, they are approached separately. This requires placement of an additional 5-mm working port lateral to the rectus muscle above the level of the umbilicus (Fig. 1). This additional port facilitates introduction of the LigaSure V 5-mm sealer/divider (Covidien, Boulder, Col.) to fuse and ligate the deep inferior epigastric vessels. After ensuring hemostasis, the ports are removed and incisions are closed in the usual fashion. When compared with the open procedure, the laparoscopic delay described here has resulted in significantly decreased abdominal tissue morbidity and has maintained improved flap outcomes. It avoids large incisions; wound complications such as seromas; and edematous, friable tissue, which are complications frequently encountered with the open delay technique. Our technique also addresses both the superficial and deep inferior epigastric vessels, thereby providing a potentially larger, more reliable skin paddle. Nita Nair, M.D. Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, Mich. Dunya M. Atisha, M.D. Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, Mich. Department of Surgery University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City, Iowa Rachel Streu, M.D., M.S. Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical Center Department of Surgery St. Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor, Mich. E. Dale Collins, M.D., M.S. Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery Dartmouth Medical School Lebanon, N.H. Kathleen Diehl, M.D. Section of Surgical Oncology Department of Surgery Mark Pearlman, M.D. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amy K. Alderman, M.D., M.P.H. Section of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, Mich. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial or commercial interests related to this research. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesFrench-language works237,207