Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Recent Lessing scholarship has attempted to show that Lessing's objections to Racinian tragedy are less severe than they appear, and that his dismissal of Racine can be explained almost entirely by his efforts to decry the influence of French neo-classicism on German drama. It has been suggested that Lessing may have been aware of his many similarities to Racine, but realized that his polemical attack against the French would lose its forcefulness if he were to admit exceptions. The present study argues that scholars have wrongly minimized the substance of Lessing's criticisms of Racine in their exclusive emphasis on his polemical goals, and that they have also portrayed his judgment of Racine as more inconsistent – and favorable – than it actually is (Brown 263-65; Ritchie 129). An analysis of a misunderstood passage of Lessing's criticism will reveal similarities between Lessing and Racine that have not received sufficient attention in previous studies. But when read in its proper context, the passage also yields insights into why, even if Lessing actually did recognize his similarities to Racine, this recognition would presumably not have been strong enough to counterbalance his conviction that he is fundamentally dissimilar to Racine. As this study will show, Lessing's rejection of Racine stems both from his larger polemical goals and from his genuine inability to see in Racine anything but a gallant court poet. In the Conclusion to Letter 332 of the Briefe, die neueste Literatur betreffend, Lessing concurs with Johann Nikolaus Meinhard's explanation for why fifteenthcentury Italy produced few great writers despite the generous patronage of the Medicis. In a passage quoted by Lessing, Meinhard claims that there is no correlation between political sponsorship and literary achievement, since the genius needs no incentive to create. After all, Pietro Metastasio produced exceptional libretti as a poor baker's son, Shakespeare became ein groser Poet, ohne irgend eine Aufmunterung zu haben, ja so gar, ohne selbst es zu wissen, and Jean Racine would have produced better tragedies if he had not been obligated to please the government of Louis XIV:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».