Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The American Peptide Society returned its Symposium to sunny San Diego following trips to Montreal, Quebec and Bloomington, Indiana. The theme of this 22nd Symposium was “Building Bridges” symbolizing the important role that peptide science currently plays in so many other disciplines. The program of this Symposium explored the potential impact of peptides in scientific fields that have yet to fully realize the utility of these wonderful molecules. The Symposium brought together investigators of varying backgrounds and fostered stimulating discussions, and hopefully catalyzed future multidisciplinary collaborations. Young investigators are an important element of our Society and their enthusiasm was clearly displayed through the unexpected enrollment of over 200 students in the poster competition. Many of these students also participated in a new Symposium event: Rapid-Fire oral poster presentations (3 slides, 5 min each) held during the first two lunch breaks of the Symposium. In addition, the main program featured Bert Schram Young Investigator oral presentations, highlighting the work of several of our most promising young researchers in peptide science. We were pleased to be able to support the attendance of many of these young scientists through approximately $50,000 in travel grants. In addition, the Bert Schram foundation helped to support a round-table professional development luncheon followed by a stimulating presentation and discussion on the future of peptide science. The scientific program for 2011 was filled with distinguished lectures delivered by some of the most prominent peptide scientists in the world. The symposium was opened with an unexpected distinguished lecture by Richard Houghten and closed with the chemistry and philosophy of Barry Sharpless. Keeping with the Symposium theme, Building Bridges, approximately 57 of the 78 speakers had not previously presented their work at the APS, and many were attending our conference for the first time in their career. The Symposium highlighted presentations from APS award winners, including Richard DiMarchi (Merrifield Award), Jeffery Kelly (Makineni Award), Victor Hruby (Goodman Award) and, for the first time at the APS Symposium, the two duVigneau Award winners, Morten Meldal and Fernando Albericio. The final session of the symposium, Building Bridges, was dedicated to emerging areas not traditionally associated with the peptide field such as renewable biofuels and synthetic biology, The meeting was held at the Sheraton Hotel and Marina on Harbor Island, which served as an outstanding venue to facilitate scientific interaction by mixing posters, exhibitors and social and professional networking. The opening reception was held on the hotel's front lawn overlooking the beautiful San Diego Harbor and the iconic Coronado Bay Bridge. Following San Diego APS tradition, the speakers' dinner was held at the Scripps Aquarium where attendees were treated to a beautiful sunset overlooking the shores of La Jolla. In between sessions, attendees enjoyed several beautiful pools, a picturesque harbor, baseball games, casino trips, excellent restaurants and prime views of an evening sailing regatta in San Diego Bay. The meeting was capped with the closing banquet that included dinner and dancing. We are deeply indebted to numerous individuals who assisted in the organization, execution and funding of the meeting, including members of the Scientific Committee, Student Affairs Committee and Travel Award Committee. It was our pleasure and honor to have chaired this Symposium and with the best of luck to the organizers of the 2013 Symposium. JOEL SCHNEIDER PHILIP DAWSON
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».