Bibliographic record
Abstract
The American Peptide Society returned its Symposium to sunny San Diego following trips to Montreal, Quebec and Bloomington, Indiana. The theme of this 22nd Symposium was “Building Bridges” symbolizing the important role that peptide science currently plays in so many other disciplines. The program of this Symposium explored the potential impact of peptides in scientific fields that have yet to fully realize the utility of these wonderful molecules. The Symposium brought together investigators of varying backgrounds and fostered stimulating discussions, and hopefully catalyzed future multidisciplinary collaborations. Young investigators are an important element of our Society and their enthusiasm was clearly displayed through the unexpected enrollment of over 200 students in the poster competition. Many of these students also participated in a new Symposium event: Rapid-Fire oral poster presentations (3 slides, 5 min each) held during the first two lunch breaks of the Symposium. In addition, the main program featured Bert Schram Young Investigator oral presentations, highlighting the work of several of our most promising young researchers in peptide science. We were pleased to be able to support the attendance of many of these young scientists through approximately $50,000 in travel grants. In addition, the Bert Schram foundation helped to support a round-table professional development luncheon followed by a stimulating presentation and discussion on the future of peptide science. The scientific program for 2011 was filled with distinguished lectures delivered by some of the most prominent peptide scientists in the world. The symposium was opened with an unexpected distinguished lecture by Richard Houghten and closed with the chemistry and philosophy of Barry Sharpless. Keeping with the Symposium theme, Building Bridges, approximately 57 of the 78 speakers had not previously presented their work at the APS, and many were attending our conference for the first time in their career. The Symposium highlighted presentations from APS award winners, including Richard DiMarchi (Merrifield Award), Jeffery Kelly (Makineni Award), Victor Hruby (Goodman Award) and, for the first time at the APS Symposium, the two duVigneau Award winners, Morten Meldal and Fernando Albericio. The final session of the symposium, Building Bridges, was dedicated to emerging areas not traditionally associated with the peptide field such as renewable biofuels and synthetic biology, The meeting was held at the Sheraton Hotel and Marina on Harbor Island, which served as an outstanding venue to facilitate scientific interaction by mixing posters, exhibitors and social and professional networking. The opening reception was held on the hotel's front lawn overlooking the beautiful San Diego Harbor and the iconic Coronado Bay Bridge. Following San Diego APS tradition, the speakers' dinner was held at the Scripps Aquarium where attendees were treated to a beautiful sunset overlooking the shores of La Jolla. In between sessions, attendees enjoyed several beautiful pools, a picturesque harbor, baseball games, casino trips, excellent restaurants and prime views of an evening sailing regatta in San Diego Bay. The meeting was capped with the closing banquet that included dinner and dancing. We are deeply indebted to numerous individuals who assisted in the organization, execution and funding of the meeting, including members of the Scientific Committee, Student Affairs Committee and Travel Award Committee. It was our pleasure and honor to have chaired this Symposium and with the best of luck to the organizers of the 2013 Symposium. JOEL SCHNEIDER PHILIP DAWSON
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.117 | 0.092 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".