A Case of Postictal Transient Anterograde and Retrograde Amnesia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We report the uncommon case of a 27-year-old man with transient epileptic amnesia (TEA) with long-lasting episodes. Seizures (one to five monthly) began 2 years after the spectacular recovery from a cerebral hemorrhagic contusion with coma for 1 month at age 18 years. The usual manifestation of his seizures is an ascending wave from the abdomen. At age 25 years, he had his first grouped seizures (20 to 30 within 3 days), resulting in an amnesic state, which reoccurred 10 times since then. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed multiple punctiform hemosiderin deposits in the white matter underlying the pars triangularis of the right frontal lobe and the right posteromedial parietal lobe, as well as lesions in the right amygdala and entorhinal cortex. During video-EEG monitoring, we recorded 28 seizures (0.5–3 min), spread over a period of 3 days, starting in the anterior right hemisphere, involving secondarily the left side, with occasionally a temporal predominance. We completed a neuropsychological evaluation before these grouped seizures. Almost all nonmemory scores were within 1 SD of the mean. Immediate memory performances revealed minor difficulties. Delayed memory tests demonstrated deficits in recall but not recognition. Performances for autobiographic events and personal semantic memories showed no interictal difficulty (Table 1). The second memory evaluation (Table 1), carried out on the first 2 postictal days when the EEG was completely normal, revealed severe memory impairments in immediate recall (50% less information recalled than interictally) and in delayed recall. For some tasks, no material could be evoked, but recognition was spared. Retrograde memory assessment was based on autobiographic memories collected interictally, by providing the necessary minimal clue to elicit each memory. When no memory could be evoked, additional clues were given. Remote memory of events before his traumatic cerebral contusion showed a good report. By contrast, memories occurring after his trauma and his first seizure (at age 20 years) required additional clues and were poorly reported, those from the last 4 months being not reported at all. Thus a temporal gradient for autobiographic events was observed. Personal semantic memories were equivalent to the interictal memories. Two weeks later, his mother reported very little improvement, but interictal abilities were recovered 2 months later. His TEA includes anterograde and retrograde amnesia. EEG established that his amnesia is postictal and thus analogous to Todd's paralysis. Few cases of unusual functional paralysis after seizures have been reported: one with apraxia, and one with hemineglect lasting for >70 h (1). The particularly long amnesia (weeks) and the early apparition of TEA (at age 25 years) contrast with previously reported TEA cases (2–5). His anterograde memory reveals good recognition but impaired recall performance, suggesting retrieval difficulties with preserved encoding abilities. Such dissociations have been explained by frontal lobe dysfunctions (6–9). In this patient, the presence of frontal lobe lesions and the fact that seizures start in anterior regions might be responsible for these findings. The transient retrograde amnesia documented here selectively affects memories acquired after, but not before, his head trauma or his first seizure or both. These memories appear to be particularly vulnerable to TEA. The temporal gradient associated with transient retrograde amnesia suggests that the dysfunction interferes with hippocampal consolidation (10), arguing for a mediotemporal-related deficit.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».