MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Case of Postictal Transient Anterograde and Retrograde Amnesia

2004· letter· en· W2091772819 on OpenAlexaff
Geneviève Maheu, Claude Adam, P Hazemann, Michel Baulac, Séverine Samson

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2004
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnterograde amnesiaAmnesiaPsychologyIctalTemporal lobeRetrograde amnesiaRecallHippocampusEntorhinal cortexMemory disorderEpilepsyAudiologyAnesthesiaNeuroscienceMedicineCognitive disorderPsychiatryCognitive psychologyCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the uncommon case of a 27-year-old man with transient epileptic amnesia (TEA) with long-lasting episodes. Seizures (one to five monthly) began 2 years after the spectacular recovery from a cerebral hemorrhagic contusion with coma for 1 month at age 18 years. The usual manifestation of his seizures is an ascending wave from the abdomen. At age 25 years, he had his first grouped seizures (20 to 30 within 3 days), resulting in an amnesic state, which reoccurred 10 times since then. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed multiple punctiform hemosiderin deposits in the white matter underlying the pars triangularis of the right frontal lobe and the right posteromedial parietal lobe, as well as lesions in the right amygdala and entorhinal cortex. During video-EEG monitoring, we recorded 28 seizures (0.5–3 min), spread over a period of 3 days, starting in the anterior right hemisphere, involving secondarily the left side, with occasionally a temporal predominance. We completed a neuropsychological evaluation before these grouped seizures. Almost all nonmemory scores were within 1 SD of the mean. Immediate memory performances revealed minor difficulties. Delayed memory tests demonstrated deficits in recall but not recognition. Performances for autobiographic events and personal semantic memories showed no interictal difficulty (Table 1). The second memory evaluation (Table 1), carried out on the first 2 postictal days when the EEG was completely normal, revealed severe memory impairments in immediate recall (50% less information recalled than interictally) and in delayed recall. For some tasks, no material could be evoked, but recognition was spared. Retrograde memory assessment was based on autobiographic memories collected interictally, by providing the necessary minimal clue to elicit each memory. When no memory could be evoked, additional clues were given. Remote memory of events before his traumatic cerebral contusion showed a good report. By contrast, memories occurring after his trauma and his first seizure (at age 20 years) required additional clues and were poorly reported, those from the last 4 months being not reported at all. Thus a temporal gradient for autobiographic events was observed. Personal semantic memories were equivalent to the interictal memories. Two weeks later, his mother reported very little improvement, but interictal abilities were recovered 2 months later. His TEA includes anterograde and retrograde amnesia. EEG established that his amnesia is postictal and thus analogous to Todd's paralysis. Few cases of unusual functional paralysis after seizures have been reported: one with apraxia, and one with hemineglect lasting for >70 h (1). The particularly long amnesia (weeks) and the early apparition of TEA (at age 25 years) contrast with previously reported TEA cases (2–5). His anterograde memory reveals good recognition but impaired recall performance, suggesting retrieval difficulties with preserved encoding abilities. Such dissociations have been explained by frontal lobe dysfunctions (6–9). In this patient, the presence of frontal lobe lesions and the fact that seizures start in anterior regions might be responsible for these findings. The transient retrograde amnesia documented here selectively affects memories acquired after, but not before, his head trauma or his first seizure or both. These memories appear to be particularly vulnerable to TEA. The temporal gradient associated with transient retrograde amnesia suggests that the dysfunction interferes with hippocampal consolidation (10), arguing for a mediotemporal-related deficit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicMemory and Neural MechanismsFrench-language works237,207