MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2091858450 · doi:10.1242/jeb.02466

NANO-FAST NEMATOCYSTS

2006· article· en· W2091858450 sur OpenAlexaff
Douglas S. Fudge

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueNanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCnidocyteNano-BiologyMaterials scienceEcologyComposite material

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The group Cnidaria, which includes jellyfish, anemones, corals and the familiar freshwater Hydra, is not generally known for its speed. In fact, it was only in the mid 18th century that they were first accepted as animals by biologists, having been categorized alongside plants for centuries. However, in a twist of historical irony, a recent paper by Nüchter and colleagues has demonstrated that these animals carry out one of the fastest mechanical processes in the animal kingdom.One of the keys to the cnidarians' diversity and longevity (11 000 extant species, 600 million years on Earth) is undoubtedly their invention of the nematocyst. Nematocysts are explosive cellular structures that fire a tiny barbed harpoon into predators and prey and inject a painful and paralyzing cocktail of chemicals. While contact with nematocysts by humans is more often uncomfortable than fatal, small crustaceans, worms and even fish often do not survive the encounter.Discharge of the harpoon tip or `stylet' was known to be fast, but no one knew precisely how fast. Using even the fastest high-speed cameras, the transition of the nematocyst from the undischarged to the discharged state appeared instantaneous, with no intermediates in between. However, high-speed camera technology has improved enormously in the past few years, and in this study, Nüchter and colleagues used a state-of-the art camera to finally resolve the kinetics of nematocyst discharge. With exposure times as short as 200 ns, they were just able to capture nematocysts in motion for the first time.What they found was truly astounding. Discharge of the barbed stylet was complete in about 700 ns (0.0000007 s), which makes it one of the fastest biological events ever measured. The average velocity of the stylet was about 14 m s-1, with a final velocity of about 25 m s-1. This means that nematocysts are faster than the fastest human sprinter and somewhere between lions and pronghorn antelopes in terms of maximum speed. Of course, nematocysts don't keep this speed up for very long. In fact, the researchers found that the average distance travelled by the stylet was about 13 μm, which is perfectly adequate for a weapon that is discharged by direct contact with its target. While the speed of discharge is impressive,the acceleration is even more so. The team found accelerations that were 1-5 million times the acceleration due to gravity (g). This kind of acceleration is difficult for humans to imagine, especially if you consider that we tend to black out at sustained accelerations greater than only 6 g. In 2004, Patek and coworkers demonstrated in a Nature paper that mantis shrimps are capable of accelerating their striking limbs at more than 10 000 g, which at the time was the highest acceleration recorded from any organism. Nematocysts appear to achieve accelerations that are 500 times greater.The upshot of all this is that the discharged stylet strikes its target with enough energy to pierce even the tough armour of exoskeleton-sporting prey (and sometimes human skin). Once the armour is breached, a long, coiled tubule everts from the nematocyst capsule through the stylet and into the victim. Further contraction of the capsule forces neurotoxins through the tubule, paralyzing and often killing the victim. The researchers found that tubule eversion was considerably slower than stylet discharge, with kinetics in the leisurely millisecond range.With the kinetics of discharge now much clearer, researchers will undoubtedly turn their attention to other unresolved questions such as how energy is stored in the capsule and how that energy is released and converted into the kinetic energy of the stylet and tubule. Stay tuned for more studies of these fascinating microscopic weapons.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,562

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Experimental BiologyMême sujetNanocluster Synthesis and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207