MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091858450 · doi:10.1242/jeb.02466

NANO-FAST NEMATOCYSTS

2006· article· en· W2091858450 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas S. Fudge

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCnidocyteNano-BiologyMaterials scienceEcologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The group Cnidaria, which includes jellyfish, anemones, corals and the familiar freshwater Hydra, is not generally known for its speed. In fact, it was only in the mid 18th century that they were first accepted as animals by biologists, having been categorized alongside plants for centuries. However, in a twist of historical irony, a recent paper by Nüchter and colleagues has demonstrated that these animals carry out one of the fastest mechanical processes in the animal kingdom.One of the keys to the cnidarians' diversity and longevity (11 000 extant species, 600 million years on Earth) is undoubtedly their invention of the nematocyst. Nematocysts are explosive cellular structures that fire a tiny barbed harpoon into predators and prey and inject a painful and paralyzing cocktail of chemicals. While contact with nematocysts by humans is more often uncomfortable than fatal, small crustaceans, worms and even fish often do not survive the encounter.Discharge of the harpoon tip or `stylet' was known to be fast, but no one knew precisely how fast. Using even the fastest high-speed cameras, the transition of the nematocyst from the undischarged to the discharged state appeared instantaneous, with no intermediates in between. However, high-speed camera technology has improved enormously in the past few years, and in this study, Nüchter and colleagues used a state-of-the art camera to finally resolve the kinetics of nematocyst discharge. With exposure times as short as 200 ns, they were just able to capture nematocysts in motion for the first time.What they found was truly astounding. Discharge of the barbed stylet was complete in about 700 ns (0.0000007 s), which makes it one of the fastest biological events ever measured. The average velocity of the stylet was about 14 m s-1, with a final velocity of about 25 m s-1. This means that nematocysts are faster than the fastest human sprinter and somewhere between lions and pronghorn antelopes in terms of maximum speed. Of course, nematocysts don't keep this speed up for very long. In fact, the researchers found that the average distance travelled by the stylet was about 13 μm, which is perfectly adequate for a weapon that is discharged by direct contact with its target. While the speed of discharge is impressive,the acceleration is even more so. The team found accelerations that were 1-5 million times the acceleration due to gravity (g). This kind of acceleration is difficult for humans to imagine, especially if you consider that we tend to black out at sustained accelerations greater than only 6 g. In 2004, Patek and coworkers demonstrated in a Nature paper that mantis shrimps are capable of accelerating their striking limbs at more than 10 000 g, which at the time was the highest acceleration recorded from any organism. Nematocysts appear to achieve accelerations that are 500 times greater.The upshot of all this is that the discharged stylet strikes its target with enough energy to pierce even the tough armour of exoskeleton-sporting prey (and sometimes human skin). Once the armour is breached, a long, coiled tubule everts from the nematocyst capsule through the stylet and into the victim. Further contraction of the capsule forces neurotoxins through the tubule, paralyzing and often killing the victim. The researchers found that tubule eversion was considerably slower than stylet discharge, with kinetics in the leisurely millisecond range.With the kinetics of discharge now much clearer, researchers will undoubtedly turn their attention to other unresolved questions such as how energy is stored in the capsule and how that energy is released and converted into the kinetic energy of the stylet and tubule. Stay tuned for more studies of these fascinating microscopic weapons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicNanocluster Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207