The Sacchetti Family, Their Art Patronage and Political Aspirations (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Sacchetti Family, Their Art Patronage and Political Aspirations Sheila Das (bio) Lilian H. Zirpolo. The Sacchetti Family, Their Art Patronage and Political Aspirations Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies. 256. $24.50 In this book, Lilian H. Zirpolo examines the patronage interests of the Sacchetti family after their transfer from Tuscany to Rome. The trajectory of the study follows this family's rise and decline in fortune and political importance from the seventeenth to the early eighteenth century. The result is a far-reaching work that explains the progress and ambitions of leading members of the family as shown through highly self-conscious commissions and displays of art. The book is divided into five chapters and a conclusion. In chapter 1, the construction and decoration of the Sacchetti Chapel at S. Giovanni dei Fiorentini opens the investigation, framed by its commission, which the committed but inexperienced Giovanni Sacchetti had left in his will. A detailed inventory of selections, an analysis of these works, the arrangements, and the artists follows, so as to lead to an assessment of the rhetorical effect the chapel promised for the benefit of its patrons. Zirpolo focuses on the significance of choosing the promising painter Giovanni Lanfranco in order to assure that the family's chapel stand out in inventiveness while at the same time having the images conform to and therefore satisfy criteria of the Counter-Reformation church. From this is teased out the Sacchetti's allegiance to the church's policies together with their hopes to climb the papal ladder. A similar rigour reappears in the ensuing [End Page 421] chapters. In chapter 2, Marcello Sacchetti's role as patron of artists and art adviser to Pope Urban viii takes the focus. Chapter 3 explores the domestic arena of art display in the villa at Castelfuoco, where less accomplished artists were employed to produce a program harmonious with Renaissance theory of appropriate decoration insofar as it should reflect the status of the patron. As Zirpolo writes, however, the gallery frescoes imply more, indicating the Sachetti's wish for advancement, specifically by Cardinal Giulio in his ecclesiastical career. The language here occasionally leans towards conjecture, as some unsupported claims and conditional phrases crowd together ('the idea ... was undoubtedly Marcello's'; 'while Marcello may have provided the incentive'; 'in fact, it was his knowledge of the subject that most likely prompted Alexander viii ... to appoint him Prefect of the Congregation of Rites'). In the next chapter, the author studies Giulio's successful career hand-in-hand with his patronage, notably marking a new stage in which the Sacchetti begin to commission established masters for family aggrandizement. For example, patronage of the Bolognese school is linked to a desire to furnish the Sacchetti family collection of Bolognese art reform whereas Giulio's construction and decoration of the Villa del Pigneto, being similar to the Palestrinian sanctuary owned by the Barberini, is linked to demonstrating his allegiance to the pope and so too his papal aspirations. Chapter 5 charts the decline of the family, occurring with the second generation in Rome, during which patronage of the foreigner, Van Wittel, and the lending of the family's collections for exhibitions signal both a persistent and restricted commitment to the arts of their times. It is in the tightly woven and persuasive conclusion that Zirpolo brings together all the connections between political status, financial resources, fashion, and art commissions that surfaced at every turn. Great changes in artistic taste and patronage ability are clearly marked out by historical differences, site, and audience. Thus the study finishes with a flourish, presenting a greater understanding of the Sacchetti's art patronage evolving as a whole. The changing face of this patronage is a challenging subject, given the many divergences in the patrons' artistic understanding, patriotism, ecclesiastical concerns, resources, and sites. Zirpolo's thoroughness and clarity at each stage elucidates these particulars meaningfully, illuminating the passage of the Sacchetti as patrons of the arts and the significance of art display in self-presentation and propaganda from the early modern period to the Enlightenment. Sheila Das Sheila Das, Department of Italian, University of Toronto Copyright © 2007 University of Toronto Press Incorporated...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».