MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093046090 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0050

The Sacchetti Family, Their Art Patronage and Political Aspirations (review)

2007· article· en· W2093046090 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sheila Das

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChapelPoliticsAllegiancePaintingRhetorical questionOrder (exchange)ArtThe artsSociologyArt historyLawVisual artsPolitical scienceLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Sacchetti Family, Their Art Patronage and Political Aspirations Sheila Das (bio) Lilian H. Zirpolo. The Sacchetti Family, Their Art Patronage and Political Aspirations Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies. 256. $24.50 In this book, Lilian H. Zirpolo examines the patronage interests of the Sacchetti family after their transfer from Tuscany to Rome. The trajectory of the study follows this family's rise and decline in fortune and political importance from the seventeenth to the early eighteenth century. The result is a far-reaching work that explains the progress and ambitions of leading members of the family as shown through highly self-conscious commissions and displays of art. The book is divided into five chapters and a conclusion. In chapter 1, the construction and decoration of the Sacchetti Chapel at S. Giovanni dei Fiorentini opens the investigation, framed by its commission, which the committed but inexperienced Giovanni Sacchetti had left in his will. A detailed inventory of selections, an analysis of these works, the arrangements, and the artists follows, so as to lead to an assessment of the rhetorical effect the chapel promised for the benefit of its patrons. Zirpolo focuses on the significance of choosing the promising painter Giovanni Lanfranco in order to assure that the family's chapel stand out in inventiveness while at the same time having the images conform to and therefore satisfy criteria of the Counter-Reformation church. From this is teased out the Sacchetti's allegiance to the church's policies together with their hopes to climb the papal ladder. A similar rigour reappears in the ensuing [End Page 421] chapters. In chapter 2, Marcello Sacchetti's role as patron of artists and art adviser to Pope Urban viii takes the focus. Chapter 3 explores the domestic arena of art display in the villa at Castelfuoco, where less accomplished artists were employed to produce a program harmonious with Renaissance theory of appropriate decoration insofar as it should reflect the status of the patron. As Zirpolo writes, however, the gallery frescoes imply more, indicating the Sachetti's wish for advancement, specifically by Cardinal Giulio in his ecclesiastical career. The language here occasionally leans towards conjecture, as some unsupported claims and conditional phrases crowd together ('the idea ... was undoubtedly Marcello's'; 'while Marcello may have provided the incentive'; 'in fact, it was his knowledge of the subject that most likely prompted Alexander viii ... to appoint him Prefect of the Congregation of Rites'). In the next chapter, the author studies Giulio's successful career hand-in-hand with his patronage, notably marking a new stage in which the Sacchetti begin to commission established masters for family aggrandizement. For example, patronage of the Bolognese school is linked to a desire to furnish the Sacchetti family collection of Bolognese art reform whereas Giulio's construction and decoration of the Villa del Pigneto, being similar to the Palestrinian sanctuary owned by the Barberini, is linked to demonstrating his allegiance to the pope and so too his papal aspirations. Chapter 5 charts the decline of the family, occurring with the second generation in Rome, during which patronage of the foreigner, Van Wittel, and the lending of the family's collections for exhibitions signal both a persistent and restricted commitment to the arts of their times. It is in the tightly woven and persuasive conclusion that Zirpolo brings together all the connections between political status, financial resources, fashion, and art commissions that surfaced at every turn. Great changes in artistic taste and patronage ability are clearly marked out by historical differences, site, and audience. Thus the study finishes with a flourish, presenting a greater understanding of the Sacchetti's art patronage evolving as a whole. The changing face of this patronage is a challenging subject, given the many divergences in the patrons' artistic understanding, patriotism, ecclesiastical concerns, resources, and sites. Zirpolo's thoroughness and clarity at each stage elucidates these particulars meaningfully, illuminating the passage of the Sacchetti as patrons of the arts and the significance of art display in self-presentation and propaganda from the early modern period to the Enlightenment. Sheila Das Sheila Das, Department of Italian, University of Toronto Copyright © 2007 University of Toronto Press Incorporated...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207