MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2094403599 · doi:10.1093/fs/knp197

The Life and Travels of Xavier Marmier (1808-1892): Bringing World Literature to France The Life and Travels of Xavier Marmier (1808-1892): Bringing World Literature to France. By W.S. M <scp>ercer</scp> . Oxford: OUP, 2007. xvii + 349 pp. Hb £50.00.

2009· article· en· W2094403599 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrench Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature and Culture Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGermanHistoryHERONorwegianIcelandicBiographyMonarchyClassicsArtAncient historyLiteratureArt historyPolitical sciencePoliticsLawArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Xavier Marmier, a hitherto marginalized figure of French nineteenth-century letters, is brought vividly to life in Wendy Mercer's meticulously researched biography. The son of impoverished gentlefolk, whose early career reads like that of a Balzacian hero, Marmier left his native Franche-Comté for the Paris of the July Monarchy starting out as a journalist. Soon, he made his mark as a poet, novelist, lecturer and literary critic before finding true fame as an exceptionally talented travel writer, linguist, translator, ethnologist and social historian. Mercer identifies Marmier's greatest achievement as an initiator who brought an awareness of foreign literatures and cultures to a France which, prior to the nineteenth century, had been convinced of her own cultural supremacy. Marmier's travels took him to Germany, Iceland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Russia, Poland, Holland, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldavia and several Balkan states, Turkey, Palestine, Syria, Egypt, Algeria, the USA, Canada, Argentina, and Uruguay. He learned English, German, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, Icelandic, Sami, Dutch, Spanish, Russian, Serbo-Croat, and Italian. He also taught himself Anglo-Saxon and could converse in Latin if all else failed. Colonial expansion and the birth of the tourist industry provided Marmier with a ready audience for his work but what made him unique among travel writers of the period was his insistence on experiencing life as it was lived in the countries he visited through learning the language and actually sharing the day-to-day lives of the people he met. While not blind to his flaws as a man, such as his disingenuous attitude towards certain friends and fellow writers, his mixture of reactionary and humanist views, and his paradoxical ideological and political stance as an Orleanist and supporter of French colonialism on the one hand and a despiser of capitalism on the other, Mercer's portrait is essentially a celebratory and sympathetic one. She focuses especially on demonstrating that part of his special appeal was that he visited countries that had not been much documented at the time. Similarly, for the modern reader, Marmier's writings constitute valuable social documents on the countries he visited. Mercer is particularly good on Marmier's journeys across northern Europe and the Americas. Scholars keen to discover Marmier's travels and opinions on North Africa, the Middle East and Turkey, however, may be a little disappointed, however, as Mercer dismisses these as the least interesting aspects of his writing. This is a pity as Marmier's sometimes contradictory colonialist, nationalistic and racist views towards the Islamic world, while perhaps not seeming to provide any new information on the people or locations visited, are nevertheless still worthy of exploration within the context of nineteenth-century France's foreign policy and her wider colonial ambitions as well as her relationship with the Ottoman Empire, and the other world powers, Britain, Prussia, and Russia. It is hoped that Mercer's thought provoking book will encourage other scholars to rediscover Marmier for themselves now that the critical debate surrounding his works has been so deftly opened up.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,822
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrench StudiesMême sujetLiterature and Culture StudiesTravaux en français237 207