MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094403599 · doi:10.1093/fs/knp197

The Life and Travels of Xavier Marmier (1808-1892): Bringing World Literature to France The Life and Travels of Xavier Marmier (1808-1892): Bringing World Literature to France. By W.S. M <scp>ercer</scp> . Oxford: OUP, 2007. xvii + 349 pp. Hb £50.00.

2009· article· en· W2094403599 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanHistoryHERONorwegianIcelandicBiographyMonarchyClassicsArtAncient historyLiteratureArt historyPolitical sciencePoliticsLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xavier Marmier, a hitherto marginalized figure of French nineteenth-century letters, is brought vividly to life in Wendy Mercer's meticulously researched biography. The son of impoverished gentlefolk, whose early career reads like that of a Balzacian hero, Marmier left his native Franche-Comté for the Paris of the July Monarchy starting out as a journalist. Soon, he made his mark as a poet, novelist, lecturer and literary critic before finding true fame as an exceptionally talented travel writer, linguist, translator, ethnologist and social historian. Mercer identifies Marmier's greatest achievement as an initiator who brought an awareness of foreign literatures and cultures to a France which, prior to the nineteenth century, had been convinced of her own cultural supremacy. Marmier's travels took him to Germany, Iceland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Russia, Poland, Holland, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldavia and several Balkan states, Turkey, Palestine, Syria, Egypt, Algeria, the USA, Canada, Argentina, and Uruguay. He learned English, German, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, Icelandic, Sami, Dutch, Spanish, Russian, Serbo-Croat, and Italian. He also taught himself Anglo-Saxon and could converse in Latin if all else failed. Colonial expansion and the birth of the tourist industry provided Marmier with a ready audience for his work but what made him unique among travel writers of the period was his insistence on experiencing life as it was lived in the countries he visited through learning the language and actually sharing the day-to-day lives of the people he met. While not blind to his flaws as a man, such as his disingenuous attitude towards certain friends and fellow writers, his mixture of reactionary and humanist views, and his paradoxical ideological and political stance as an Orleanist and supporter of French colonialism on the one hand and a despiser of capitalism on the other, Mercer's portrait is essentially a celebratory and sympathetic one. She focuses especially on demonstrating that part of his special appeal was that he visited countries that had not been much documented at the time. Similarly, for the modern reader, Marmier's writings constitute valuable social documents on the countries he visited. Mercer is particularly good on Marmier's journeys across northern Europe and the Americas. Scholars keen to discover Marmier's travels and opinions on North Africa, the Middle East and Turkey, however, may be a little disappointed, however, as Mercer dismisses these as the least interesting aspects of his writing. This is a pity as Marmier's sometimes contradictory colonialist, nationalistic and racist views towards the Islamic world, while perhaps not seeming to provide any new information on the people or locations visited, are nevertheless still worthy of exploration within the context of nineteenth-century France's foreign policy and her wider colonial ambitions as well as her relationship with the Ottoman Empire, and the other world powers, Britain, Prussia, and Russia. It is hoped that Mercer's thought provoking book will encourage other scholars to rediscover Marmier for themselves now that the critical debate surrounding his works has been so deftly opened up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207