Designing High-Angle/Casing-Directionally-Drilled Wells
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract This paper discusses the design and testing of 10 ¾-in. and 7 5/8-in. casing directional drilling equipment and procedures that ConocoPhillips plans to use on a mature North Sea asset. ConocoPhillips has worked with Tesco Corp. and Schlumberger in assembling the tools necessary to complete this task. These include: downhole casing drilling tools, underreamers, positive displacement motors, MWD tools, rotary steerable systems (RSS), and high capacity winches for this work. Testing this equipment in commercial North Sea operations is prohibitively expensive. Therefore, tests were conducted at a drilling test facility near Cameron, Texas, where operations were conducted over a wide range of rotating speed, weight and flow conditions as well as inclinations from vertical to horizontal. High frequency surface and downhole drilling mechanics measurements assisted in diagnosing problems and improving the systems. The project serves as a blueprint for managing technical developments among multiple operators and service companies. Introduction ConocoPhillip's successful application of casing drilling in the Lobo trend in South Texas is well documented in terms of preventing lost circulation, eliminating stuck pipe and ultimately improving efficiency.1,2 In addition to over 120 straight wells drilled to date in South Texas, two wells were drilled in 2004 which combined a rotary steerable and casing drilling system to demonstrate that directional casing drilling was possible. These were not exhaustive tests but they proved that casing drilling directional wells with a rotary steerable system was a viable option. However that still did not answer a key question: ‘Can the straight hole benefits realized in the Lobo Field be transferred to directional drilling in an offshore working environment?’ This question can only be answered after the tools and procedures to drill complex directional wells are made available and used in offshore applications. However, in order to make offshore directional casing drilling a reality, significant technical challenges need to be overcome. Challenges beyond just the technical aspects must also be addressed before adopting this new drilling technology into a producing asset. Implementing the technology may require rig/platform equipment modifications that impact production. Consideration must be given to the possibility that the initial wells may take longer to drill as the learning curve develops. To reduce the risk associated with implementation, tests were conducted in a wellbore profile similar in complexity (hole angle, build rate, depth) to a well to be drilled off of the Eldfisk B platform offshore Norway with 10 ¾-in. and 7 ¾-in. casing. The equipment used for the field trial included the same surface equipment required to modify or adapt the rig in Norway. This was done to mirror the activity that would be involved on the platform necessary to execute the project. Safety and training were also an integral part of the project. An initiative was started in February, 2005, to prepare for directional casing drilling at Eldfisk. Schlumberger and Tesco partnered with ConocoPhillips on this challenge in order to prove up the suggested solution by executing two field tests that mirrored the wells to be drilled offshore.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».