Designing High-Angle/Casing-Directionally-Drilled Wells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper discusses the design and testing of 10 ¾-in. and 7 5/8-in. casing directional drilling equipment and procedures that ConocoPhillips plans to use on a mature North Sea asset. ConocoPhillips has worked with Tesco Corp. and Schlumberger in assembling the tools necessary to complete this task. These include: downhole casing drilling tools, underreamers, positive displacement motors, MWD tools, rotary steerable systems (RSS), and high capacity winches for this work. Testing this equipment in commercial North Sea operations is prohibitively expensive. Therefore, tests were conducted at a drilling test facility near Cameron, Texas, where operations were conducted over a wide range of rotating speed, weight and flow conditions as well as inclinations from vertical to horizontal. High frequency surface and downhole drilling mechanics measurements assisted in diagnosing problems and improving the systems. The project serves as a blueprint for managing technical developments among multiple operators and service companies. Introduction ConocoPhillip's successful application of casing drilling in the Lobo trend in South Texas is well documented in terms of preventing lost circulation, eliminating stuck pipe and ultimately improving efficiency.1,2 In addition to over 120 straight wells drilled to date in South Texas, two wells were drilled in 2004 which combined a rotary steerable and casing drilling system to demonstrate that directional casing drilling was possible. These were not exhaustive tests but they proved that casing drilling directional wells with a rotary steerable system was a viable option. However that still did not answer a key question: ‘Can the straight hole benefits realized in the Lobo Field be transferred to directional drilling in an offshore working environment?’ This question can only be answered after the tools and procedures to drill complex directional wells are made available and used in offshore applications. However, in order to make offshore directional casing drilling a reality, significant technical challenges need to be overcome. Challenges beyond just the technical aspects must also be addressed before adopting this new drilling technology into a producing asset. Implementing the technology may require rig/platform equipment modifications that impact production. Consideration must be given to the possibility that the initial wells may take longer to drill as the learning curve develops. To reduce the risk associated with implementation, tests were conducted in a wellbore profile similar in complexity (hole angle, build rate, depth) to a well to be drilled off of the Eldfisk B platform offshore Norway with 10 ¾-in. and 7 ¾-in. casing. The equipment used for the field trial included the same surface equipment required to modify or adapt the rig in Norway. This was done to mirror the activity that would be involved on the platform necessary to execute the project. Safety and training were also an integral part of the project. An initiative was started in February, 2005, to prepare for directional casing drilling at Eldfisk. Schlumberger and Tesco partnered with ConocoPhillips on this challenge in order to prove up the suggested solution by executing two field tests that mirrored the wells to be drilled offshore.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".