First Report of <i>Puccinia lagenophorae</i> on Common Groundsel (<i>Senecio vulgaris</i>) in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rust disease on common groundsel was independently collected from two backyard gardens in Alberta, Canada during 2005, the first on September 11 in Sherwood Park (53.542°N, 113.262°W) and the second on September 18 in Edmonton (53.463°N, 113.593°W). Leaves of each specimen had clusters of orange, cup-shaped aecia, bordered by recurved peridia, the principal macroscopic signs of disease. Infected plants had twisted stems and deformed leaves. Spores of isolates from the two locations were (mean diameter [± s.d.; range]) 14.6 (± 1.4; 11.4 to 18.9) × 12.5 (± 1.1; 9.1 to 16.2) μm, orange, oval or angular, and many had refractive granules (3). Genomic DNA was extracted from small leaf pieces with multiple aecia, and the complete internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rust was sequenced from PCR products. The sequences determined for a representative specimen from each location were identical, including two areas of ambiguity in the ITS1 spacer region. At position 7 were two overlapping peaks (A and C), and near position 130, sequencing failed because of a suspected insertion/deletion in some ITS copies. Difficulties of sequencing through this cytosine-rich area were reported by Littlefield et al. (3). Data from cloned PCR products confirmed the presence of two ITS genotypes in each DNA extract, one identical to a sequence published for Puccinia lagenophorae on Senecio vulgaris from the United Kingdom (GenBank Accession No. AY808060 (2), and the other identical to a sequence from the United States (GenBank Accession No. AY852264) (3). They differ by an A/C transversion at position 7 and an indel, an 8/9 base poly-C run beginning at position 130. Telia and teliospores were not observed in any of the 2005 samples (some collected as late as November) or in the 2006 Edmonton site samples. Identification of the pathogen as P. lagenophorae was based on host plant symptoms (3) and molecular characters. The original source of inoculum for these infections is unknown, but on December 5, 2006, diseased specimens with sporulating aecia were found beneath 45 cm of snow at the Edmonton location, in a garden area that had not been weeded during the summer. There is reported evidence that teliospores are not functional and that P. lagenophorae overwinters on infected plants that develop aecia in the spring (1). Specimens have been deposited at the Arthur Herbarium, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN (Vouchers PUR N5414-N5417) and the National Mycological Herbarium of Canada, Ottawa, ON (Vouchers DAOM 237844, 237845, 237961, 237962, 237982, and 237990). The two cloned variants of the ITS sequence were deposited in GenBank (Accession Nos. EF212446 and EF212447). To our knowledge, this is the first report of groundsel rust caused by P. lagenophorae in Canada (G. Barron, personal communication, has images from Guelph in 2004 but no specimens were examined or preserved). Groundsel rust has been found at several locations in the United States (3) and has been reported on more than 60 species in several genera (4). Questions remain about the amount of damage that P. lagenophorae will cause to groundsel in North America and whether it will affect native Senecio species and their relatives. References: (1) J. Frantzen and H. Müller-Schärer. Plant Pathol. 48:483, 1999. (2) B. Henricot and G. Denton. Plant Pathol. 54:242, 2005. (3) L. Littlefield et al. Ann. Appl. Biol. 147:35, 2005. (4) M. Scholler. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 105:239, 1998.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».