MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095682775 · doi:10.1094/pdis-91-8-1058c

First Report of <i>Puccinia lagenophorae</i> on Common Groundsel (<i>Senecio vulgaris</i>) in Canada

2007· article· en· W2095682775 on OpenAlexaffabout
W. L. Bruckart, A. S. McClay, Sarah Hambleton, Raymond Tropiano, G. Hill-Rackette

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyInternal transcribed spacerGenBankSenecioBotanyGeneticsGeneRibosomal RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rust disease on common groundsel was independently collected from two backyard gardens in Alberta, Canada during 2005, the first on September 11 in Sherwood Park (53.542°N, 113.262°W) and the second on September 18 in Edmonton (53.463°N, 113.593°W). Leaves of each specimen had clusters of orange, cup-shaped aecia, bordered by recurved peridia, the principal macroscopic signs of disease. Infected plants had twisted stems and deformed leaves. Spores of isolates from the two locations were (mean diameter [± s.d.; range]) 14.6 (± 1.4; 11.4 to 18.9) × 12.5 (± 1.1; 9.1 to 16.2) μm, orange, oval or angular, and many had refractive granules (3). Genomic DNA was extracted from small leaf pieces with multiple aecia, and the complete internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rust was sequenced from PCR products. The sequences determined for a representative specimen from each location were identical, including two areas of ambiguity in the ITS1 spacer region. At position 7 were two overlapping peaks (A and C), and near position 130, sequencing failed because of a suspected insertion/deletion in some ITS copies. Difficulties of sequencing through this cytosine-rich area were reported by Littlefield et al. (3). Data from cloned PCR products confirmed the presence of two ITS genotypes in each DNA extract, one identical to a sequence published for Puccinia lagenophorae on Senecio vulgaris from the United Kingdom (GenBank Accession No. AY808060 (2), and the other identical to a sequence from the United States (GenBank Accession No. AY852264) (3). They differ by an A/C transversion at position 7 and an indel, an 8/9 base poly-C run beginning at position 130. Telia and teliospores were not observed in any of the 2005 samples (some collected as late as November) or in the 2006 Edmonton site samples. Identification of the pathogen as P. lagenophorae was based on host plant symptoms (3) and molecular characters. The original source of inoculum for these infections is unknown, but on December 5, 2006, diseased specimens with sporulating aecia were found beneath 45 cm of snow at the Edmonton location, in a garden area that had not been weeded during the summer. There is reported evidence that teliospores are not functional and that P. lagenophorae overwinters on infected plants that develop aecia in the spring (1). Specimens have been deposited at the Arthur Herbarium, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN (Vouchers PUR N5414-N5417) and the National Mycological Herbarium of Canada, Ottawa, ON (Vouchers DAOM 237844, 237845, 237961, 237962, 237982, and 237990). The two cloned variants of the ITS sequence were deposited in GenBank (Accession Nos. EF212446 and EF212447). To our knowledge, this is the first report of groundsel rust caused by P. lagenophorae in Canada (G. Barron, personal communication, has images from Guelph in 2004 but no specimens were examined or preserved). Groundsel rust has been found at several locations in the United States (3) and has been reported on more than 60 species in several genera (4). Questions remain about the amount of damage that P. lagenophorae will cause to groundsel in North America and whether it will affect native Senecio species and their relatives. References: (1) J. Frantzen and H. Müller-Schärer. Plant Pathol. 48:483, 1999. (2) B. Henricot and G. Denton. Plant Pathol. 54:242, 2005. (3) L. Littlefield et al. Ann. Appl. Biol. 147:35, 2005. (4) M. Scholler. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 105:239, 1998.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFrench-language works237,207