MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2096863965

Open Access and the Open Journal Systems: Making Sense All Over

2008· article· en· W2096863965 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rick Kopak

Notice bibliographique

RevueSchool Libraries Worldwide · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReading (process)AttendanceQuality (philosophy)Public relationsComputer scienceWorld Wide WebSociologyPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

At a time when students are increasingly turning to the Web as their primary source of information it is well worth continuing to consider ways and means of taking advantage of this trend, and to perhaps relocate attention to traditional information sources presented in new ways. This paper makes the case that Open Access to electronic scholarly journals creates an opportunity for schools and school libraries to benefit from use of these journals. Furthermore, the article describes work being done by the Public Knowledge Project in creating a technical infrastructure for the creation and use of Web-based electronic journals through the development of the Open Journal Systems, and the ongoing development of an interactive reading environment for these journals. the students, and for signs that they are engaging with the material being presented to them. Checking for evidence that things are sinking in often results in appeals, on my part, for comments, or perhaps direct questioning about (what I think) are the most interesting and/or salient aspects of the topic at hand. In the past, results from these quick surveys were mixed depending on, among numerous other factors, how many of the assigned readings were read, or how well presented the lecture happened to be that day. In my experience, a noticeable trend over the last few years has been a steady increase in the number of unsolicited questions and comments brought forward by students during the course of lectures. Perhaps, with increasing experience and attendance at teaching and academic growth workshops, the quality of instruction has simply gotten better. As true as this might be, an equally plausible explanation may be found in the coincident increase in the students' use of laptop computers during class. Facilitating note-taking seemed an obvious explanation at first, but the number and depth of questions really began to increase with the introduction of campus-wide wireless Internet service. Once confirmed, it became all too obvious what had happened. Students were using the Web to search for materials relevant to the topic of the lecture. They were checking facts, accessing university library resources that provided added value to the points being made in the lecture, surfing for related sites on the Web, and instant messaging with their colleagues while class was going on. The result was a manifest increase in the level of interaction with the information being covered, evidenced by an increased number of pointed, and often articulate and insightful questions and comments on the lecture material. Copyright of works published in School Libraries Worldwide is jointly held by the author(s) and by the International Association of School Librarianship. The author(s) retain copyright of their works, but give permission to the International Association of School Librarianship to reprint their works in collections or other such documents published by or on behalf of the International Association of School Librarianship. Author(s) who give permission for their works to be reprinted elsewhere should inform the Editor of School Libraries Worldwide and should ensure that the following appears with the article. Reprinted, with permission, from School Libraries Worldwide Volume 14, Number 2, July 2008, pages 45-54.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCommunication savante
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,829
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0350,127
Science ouverte0,0040,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,089
Tête enseignante GPT0,385
Écart entre enseignants0,296 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSchool Libraries WorldwideMême sujetLibrary Science and Information LiteracyTravaux en français237 207