Anti-RNA Polymerase III Antibodies as a Risk Marker for Early Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia (GAVE) in Systemic Sclerosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We read with the greatest interest the recent article by Ingraham et al, on predictors of gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) 1 .In a series of 28 patients with GAVE, only 1 patient was positive for anti-topoisomerase I (topo I), whereas 1 patient had anti-RNA polymerase III (RNAP III) antibodies, and 4 (all with rapidly progressive diffuse cutaneous involvement) had a speckled antinuclear antibody (ANA) pattern.These 4 patients were not tested for anti-RNAP III antibodies, but the authors considered likely that the patients in this group would have anti-RNAP III because of their typical clinical appearance and the absence of anti-topo I.They also reported that, in their clinical practice, another 4 patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc and GAVE were found to be anti-RNAP III positive.For these reasons, they raised the suggestion that anti-RNAP III antibodies may act as predictors for early development of GAVE in SSc patients 1 .We recently reported the clinical data of a series of anti-RNAP III positive SSc patients followed in our center 2 .Interestingly, 3 out of 18 (16.7%)anti-RNAP III positive SSc patients had been diagnosed with GAVE 2 .This proportion is relatively high, considering that GAVE prevalence was estimated at 5.7% in a population of 264 consecutive patients with SSc 3 , and suggests a possible predictive role of anti-RNAP III antibodies, as reported by Ingraham, et al.In order to verify the hypothesis that anti-RNAP III and anti-topo I antibodies are associated with different risk for early GAVE in SSc patients, we reevaluated the clinical charts of 453 consecutive patients with SSc and anti-RNAP III or anti-topo I antibodies.More than 99% of patients were Caucasian.The presence of GAVE was identified through endoscopic visual evidence in patients with SSc and unexplained iron deficiency anemia.Anti-topo I were detected by counterimmunoelectrophoresis and anti-RNAP III by ELISA.Sixteen patients with isolated anti-RNAP III antibodies (16/453; 3.5%) and 101 patients with anti-topo I (101/453; 22.2%) were identified.Three additional patients with anti-RNAP III in combination with other antinuclear specificities (anti-NOR90, anti-topo I, anti-centromere, one case each) were excluded, due to the confounding effect of the double antinuclear specificity.Patients with anti-RNAP III antibodies had more rapid disease onset, defined as the interval from appearance of Raynaud's phenomenon to first symptom other than Raynaud's (p = 0.0013).They also had faster skin thickening in the first months after SSc onset (p = 0.0002), in comparison with anti-topo I positive SSc patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».