The Betrayal of Faith: The Tragic Journey of a Colonial Native Convert (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Betrayal of Faith: The Tragic Journey of a Colonial Native Convert Dana Medoro (bio) Emma Anderson . The Betrayal of Faith: The Tragic Journey of a Colonial Native Convert. Harvard University Press. 2007. xiv, 303. US$47.50 This book brilliantly accomplishes the two tasks it sets out to do: to present a tightly focused biography of a seventeenth-century Innu man, Pierre-Anthoine Pastedechouan, and to establish the contextual complexities of his experiences as someone caught between his own people and the missionaries who took him to France and baptized him. Anderson approaches her subject as if she were holding a fine camera, zooming in to contemplate Pastedechouan in very specific scenes and traumatic moments and then widening out to frame these scenes within such powerful forces as the Reformation, the fur trade, and the nomadic practices of the seventeenth-century Innu. Nothing is skimped on; everything is richly explored and expertly handled. In sentence after sentence, Anderson packs in historical facts, cultural and geographical references, compelling analyses of Innu-French interactions, and careful consideration of human motives. She is as deft with her descriptions of the St Lawrence in the winter as she is with the intricacies of Recollet missionary ideology and Innu hunting rituals. One of the most impressive feats that Anderson accomplishes is her ability to portray individual people both as individuals - singular, complicated, surprising - and as figures undeniably formed by their linguistic, social, and philosophical environments. She thus brings Pastedechouan, along with missionary Paul Le Jeune, to dazzling life in simultaneously brave and careful interpretations of their motives and points of view. At about the midpoint of her book, Anderson writes, Le Jeune sought to reshape Pastedechouan into an active, fervent Catholic by wielding the weapons of guilt, intimidation, friendship, praise, mockery [End Page 363] and occasionally outright coercion. Pastedechouan sought to defend his prerogative to define his own religious and cultural identity by engaging the missionary with passive resistance, boundary marking, active defiance, flight, and overt challenges to Le Jeune's Christian claims. Anderson's work is ultimately structured by two main questions about the entwined histories of these two men: to what extent does the record of Pastedechouan's life and death illuminate what must have been an agonizing cultural and linguistic suspension between the French and the Innu? How can that suspension be understood in terms wider than a straightforward narrative of colonial aggression and victimization? She opens her study by 'backstreaming' to the scene of Pastedechouan's birth and to what it might have been like as he took his first breath and began the 'complex process of "becoming Innu," observing absorbing, and mirroring the religious and social practices of his people.' The scene is gripping, and it ushers in Anderson's reconstruction of the Innu world and ways of life before they found themselves in constant negotiation and struggle with the French missionaries. Her striking reconstruction of Pastedechouan's baptism in France similarly opens her discussion of seventeenth-century French Catholicism and pedagogy, and from here she sets up the cultural forces that not only pulled Pastedechouan in two but also propelled the Recollet missionaries into Quebec. This book is as beautifully written and imaginative as it is thoroughly researched and profoundly knowledgeable. From start to finish, Anderson weaves a clear and sophisticated argument into a chronicle superbly paced and consistently interesting. It manages simultaneously to be a specialized contribution to the history of religion and a fascinating resource for a wider audience. Dana Medoro Dana Medoro, Department of English, Film, and Theatre, University of Manitoba Copyright © 2010 University of Toronto Press Incorporated
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».