Clinical and Fluoroscopic Issues in the Management of Swallowing Disorders in Infants and Young Children With Tracheostomies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
No AccessPerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia)Article1 Dec 2005Clinical and Fluoroscopic Issues in the Management of Swallowing Disorders in Infants and Young Children With Tracheostomies Suzanne S. Abraham Suzanne S. Abraham Department of Otolaryngology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Montefiore Medical CenterBronx, NY Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/sasd14.4.19 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Abraham, S. (1997, November). Little tikes with trachs + Passy Muir: Airway safety, secretion, swallow.Paper presented at the annual ASHA Convention, Boston. Google Scholar Abraham, S. (2003). Babies with tracheostomies.The ASHA Leader, 8 (5), 4–5, 26. Google Scholar Abraham, S. (2005, September). Clinical management of physiological consequences of tracheostomy in infants and young children.Seminar presented to the Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatchewan, Canada. Google Scholar Abraham, S. (2005). [Swallowing physiology in tracheostomized infants and young children.Unpublished raw data. Google Scholar Abraham, S., & Wolf, E. (2000). Swallowing physiology of toddlers with long term tracheostomies: A preliminary study.Dysphagia, 15, 206–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Arvedson, J., & Brodsky, L. (1992). Pediatric tracheostomy referrals to speech-language pathology in a children’s hospital.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 23, 237–243. Google Scholar Carron, J.,Derkay, C.,Strope, G.,Nosonchuk, J., & Darrow, D. (2000). Pediatric tracheotomies: changing indications and outcomes.Laryngoscope, 110 (7), 1099–1104. Google Scholar Hadfield, P.,Lloyd-FaulconbridgeR., Almeyda, J., Albert D., & Bailey, C. (2003). The changing indications for paediatric tracheostomy.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 67, 7–10. Google Scholar Hill B. & Singer L.(1990). Speech and language development after infant tracheostomy.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 15–20. LinkGoogle Scholar Kagel M. C. (1996, March). Neuromuscular facilitation: A sensorimotor integration based adult dysphagia management approach.Seminar sponsored by Blaker Associates, Philadelphia. Google Scholar Kamen R. & Watson B.(1991). Effect of long-term tracheostomy on spectral characteristics of vowel production.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1057–1065. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Kaslon, K.,Grabo, D., & Ruben, R. (1978). Voice, speech and language habilitation in young children without laryngeal function.Archives of Otolaryngology, 104, 737–739. Google Scholar Kaslon, K., & Stein, R. (1985). Chronic pediatric tracheostomy: Assessment and implications for habilitation of voice, speech and language in young children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 9, 165–171 Google Scholar Kenna, M.,Reilly, J., & Stool, S. (1987). Tracheostomy in the preterm infant.Annals of Otology Rhinology Laryngology, 96, 68–71. Google Scholar Kertoy, M.,Guest, C.,Quart, E., & Lieh-Lai, M. (1999). Speech and phonological characteristics of individual children with a history of tracheostomy.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 42, 621–635. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Lewis, C.,Carron, J.,Perkins,J.,Sie, K., & Feudtner, C. (2003). Tracheostomy in pediatric patients.Archives of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 129, 523–529. Google Scholar Lumb, A. (2000). Nunn’s applied respiratory physiology.5th ed.). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. Google Scholar Mason, M., & Meehan, K. (1993). Tracheostomy and tracheostomy tubes.In M Mason (Ed.), Speech pathology for tracheostomized and ventilator-dependent patients (pp. 383–419). Newport Beach, CA: Voicing! Google Scholar Pereira, K., MacGregor, A., McDuffie, C., & Mitchell, R. (2003). Tracheostomy in preterm infants.Archives of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 129, 1268–1271 Google Scholar Prescott C., & Vanlierde, M. (1989). Tracheostomy in children—The Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital experience 1980–1985.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 17, 97–107. Google Scholar Rosingh, H., & Peek, S. (1999). Swallowing and speech in infants following tracheostomy.Acta Otorhinolaryn-gologica Belgium, 53, 59–63 Google Scholar Simon, B.,Fowler, S., & Handler, S. (1983). Communication development in young children with long term tracheostomies: preliminary report.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 6, 37–50. Google Scholar Simon, B., & McGowan, J. (1989). Tracheostomy in young children: Implications for assessment and treatment of communication and feeding disorders.Infants and Young Children, 1, 1–9. Google Scholar Singer, L.,Kercsmar, C.,Legris, G.,Orlowski, J.,Hill, B., & Doershuk, C. (1989). Develomental sequelae of long-term infant tracheostomy.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 31, 224–230. Google Scholar Tucker, H.,Rusnov, M., & Cohen, L. (1982). Speech development in aphonic children.Laryngoscope, 92, 566–568. Google Scholar Waldowski, K. (2002). Baby trachs: A protocol to treat pediatric patients with tracheostomies.Advance for Speech Language Pathologists and Audiologists, 12 (26), 6–9. Google Scholar Wetmore, R.,Marsh, R.,Thompson, M., & Tom, L. (1999). Pediatric tracheostomy: A changing procedure.Annals of Otology Rhinology Laryngology, 108, 695–699. Google Scholar Willging, J. P. (2000). Benefit of feeding assessment before pediatric airway reconstruction.Laryngoscope, 110, 825–834. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByPerspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups3:13 (101-112)1 Jan 2018A Patient- and Family-Centered Model of Feeding and Swallowing Management for Children With TracheostomiesArwen J. Jackson, Shaunda E. Harendt and Christopher D. BakerPerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia)15:3 (3-9)1 Oct 2006Assessment and Management Considerations for Oral Feeding of the Premature Infant on the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Amy S. Faherty Volume 14Issue 4December 2005Pages: 19-24 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Dec 1, 2005 Metrics Downloaded 76 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2005 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».