Clinical and Fluoroscopic Issues in the Management of Swallowing Disorders in Infants and Young Children With Tracheostomies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessPerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia)Article1 Dec 2005Clinical and Fluoroscopic Issues in the Management of Swallowing Disorders in Infants and Young Children With Tracheostomies Suzanne S. Abraham Suzanne S. Abraham Department of Otolaryngology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Montefiore Medical CenterBronx, NY Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/sasd14.4.19 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Abraham, S. (1997, November). Little tikes with trachs + Passy Muir: Airway safety, secretion, swallow.Paper presented at the annual ASHA Convention, Boston. Google Scholar Abraham, S. (2003). Babies with tracheostomies.The ASHA Leader, 8 (5), 4–5, 26. Google Scholar Abraham, S. (2005, September). Clinical management of physiological consequences of tracheostomy in infants and young children.Seminar presented to the Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatchewan, Canada. Google Scholar Abraham, S. (2005). [Swallowing physiology in tracheostomized infants and young children.Unpublished raw data. Google Scholar Abraham, S., & Wolf, E. (2000). Swallowing physiology of toddlers with long term tracheostomies: A preliminary study.Dysphagia, 15, 206–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Arvedson, J., & Brodsky, L. (1992). Pediatric tracheostomy referrals to speech-language pathology in a children’s hospital.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 23, 237–243. Google Scholar Carron, J.,Derkay, C.,Strope, G.,Nosonchuk, J., & Darrow, D. (2000). Pediatric tracheotomies: changing indications and outcomes.Laryngoscope, 110 (7), 1099–1104. Google Scholar Hadfield, P.,Lloyd-FaulconbridgeR., Almeyda, J., Albert D., & Bailey, C. (2003). The changing indications for paediatric tracheostomy.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 67, 7–10. Google Scholar Hill B. & Singer L.(1990). Speech and language development after infant tracheostomy.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 15–20. LinkGoogle Scholar Kagel M. C. (1996, March). Neuromuscular facilitation: A sensorimotor integration based adult dysphagia management approach.Seminar sponsored by Blaker Associates, Philadelphia. Google Scholar Kamen R. & Watson B.(1991). Effect of long-term tracheostomy on spectral characteristics of vowel production.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1057–1065. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Kaslon, K.,Grabo, D., & Ruben, R. (1978). Voice, speech and language habilitation in young children without laryngeal function.Archives of Otolaryngology, 104, 737–739. Google Scholar Kaslon, K., & Stein, R. (1985). Chronic pediatric tracheostomy: Assessment and implications for habilitation of voice, speech and language in young children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 9, 165–171 Google Scholar Kenna, M.,Reilly, J., & Stool, S. (1987). Tracheostomy in the preterm infant.Annals of Otology Rhinology Laryngology, 96, 68–71. Google Scholar Kertoy, M.,Guest, C.,Quart, E., & Lieh-Lai, M. (1999). Speech and phonological characteristics of individual children with a history of tracheostomy.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 42, 621–635. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Lewis, C.,Carron, J.,Perkins,J.,Sie, K., & Feudtner, C. (2003). Tracheostomy in pediatric patients.Archives of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 129, 523–529. Google Scholar Lumb, A. (2000). Nunn’s applied respiratory physiology.5th ed.). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. Google Scholar Mason, M., & Meehan, K. (1993). Tracheostomy and tracheostomy tubes.In M Mason (Ed.), Speech pathology for tracheostomized and ventilator-dependent patients (pp. 383–419). Newport Beach, CA: Voicing! Google Scholar Pereira, K., MacGregor, A., McDuffie, C., & Mitchell, R. (2003). Tracheostomy in preterm infants.Archives of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 129, 1268–1271 Google Scholar Prescott C., & Vanlierde, M. (1989). Tracheostomy in children—The Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital experience 1980–1985.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 17, 97–107. Google Scholar Rosingh, H., & Peek, S. (1999). Swallowing and speech in infants following tracheostomy.Acta Otorhinolaryn-gologica Belgium, 53, 59–63 Google Scholar Simon, B.,Fowler, S., & Handler, S. (1983). Communication development in young children with long term tracheostomies: preliminary report.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 6, 37–50. Google Scholar Simon, B., & McGowan, J. (1989). Tracheostomy in young children: Implications for assessment and treatment of communication and feeding disorders.Infants and Young Children, 1, 1–9. Google Scholar Singer, L.,Kercsmar, C.,Legris, G.,Orlowski, J.,Hill, B., & Doershuk, C. (1989). Develomental sequelae of long-term infant tracheostomy.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 31, 224–230. Google Scholar Tucker, H.,Rusnov, M., & Cohen, L. (1982). Speech development in aphonic children.Laryngoscope, 92, 566–568. Google Scholar Waldowski, K. (2002). Baby trachs: A protocol to treat pediatric patients with tracheostomies.Advance for Speech Language Pathologists and Audiologists, 12 (26), 6–9. Google Scholar Wetmore, R.,Marsh, R.,Thompson, M., & Tom, L. (1999). Pediatric tracheostomy: A changing procedure.Annals of Otology Rhinology Laryngology, 108, 695–699. Google Scholar Willging, J. P. (2000). Benefit of feeding assessment before pediatric airway reconstruction.Laryngoscope, 110, 825–834. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByPerspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups3:13 (101-112)1 Jan 2018A Patient- and Family-Centered Model of Feeding and Swallowing Management for Children With TracheostomiesArwen J. Jackson, Shaunda E. Harendt and Christopher D. BakerPerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia)15:3 (3-9)1 Oct 2006Assessment and Management Considerations for Oral Feeding of the Premature Infant on the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Amy S. Faherty Volume 14Issue 4December 2005Pages: 19-24 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Dec 1, 2005 Metrics Downloaded 76 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2005 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".