MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2100521391 · doi:10.1355/ae20-2f

U.S.–Singapore Free Trade Agreement:: Implications for ASEAN

2003· article· en· W2100521391 sur OpenAlex
Jose L. Tongzon

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAsean Economic Bulletin · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSocioeconomic Development in Asia
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFree trade agreementInternational economicsInternational tradeEconomicsFree trade

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The signing of the U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (USSFTA) by the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Singapore on 8 May 2003 is one of the culminations of Singapore's overall trade initiatives and economic strategy, which involves forging free trade agreements (FTAs) with other countries outside the ASEAN region. The first one was with New Zealand, which was later followed with Australia, while other FTAs are still under negotiations. This particular FTA, however, has caught much attention and has been hailed in the Singapore press as a historic and momentous event because it is the first FTA for the United States with an Asian country. On the other hand, for Singapore FTA means, apart from political considerations, much more in economic terms because of the huge market potential the United States can offer. With a population of 287.7 million and a per capita income of US$36,273, the United States can provide a strong economic stimulus which is badly needed during these times of sluggish regional growth and uncertainties. In fact, the United States has already been the largest export market and the largest source of foreign direct investments for Singapore. However, from the U.S. perspective, Singapore is not as important, as the bulk of U.S. trade is with its neighbouring developed countries such as Canada and Western Europe. This means, however, that there is a large scope for greater flow of exports from Singapore to the U.S. market. The recent FTA can certainly offer economic opportunities for trade-dependent Singapore, but what this means for the ASEAN countries as well as for ASEAN economic integration is not quite straightforward and more difficult to settle. Singapore's pursuit of extra-ASEAN FTAs has long been criticized by some fellow ASEAN members since the start of Singapore's bilateral free trade negotiations. Apart from the criticism that the other ASEAN countries were not adequately consulted by Singapore, these arrangements were seen by some as undermining ASEAN as a preferential trading arrangement. Specifically, it is claimed that these free trade arrangements could be providing Singapore's FTA partners with a back-door entry into the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA). Before addressing these concerns raised by other ASEAN countries, there is a need to explore whether there are direct and indirect benefits that can be derived by other ASEAN countries from the newly signed USSFTA. It has been argued that there could be beneficial spillover effects of Singapore's extra-ASEAN FTAs in terms of local and foreign investments for the ASEAN region. This argument is quite convincing if we recognize that Singapore does not have an unlimited capacity to absorb all of the investments that can result from the USSFTA. It is logical to infer that U.S. investors in Singapore tend to engage in third country investment projects, using Singapore as a springboard for further investments in neighbouring countries. It has to be qualified, however, that the spillover effects can only be realized if conditions in the ASEAN countries are conducive for the investors. Further, under the Integrated Sourcing Initiative (ISI) of the Agreement, which allows Singapore to source out some of its information and communications technology (ICT) and medical components from outside Singapore and still qualifies Singapore for the preferential entry into the U.S. market, there is an incentive for local and foreign firms to locate some of their production facilities in the neighbouring ASEAN countries. The USSFTA will certainly provide greater access for Singapore's exports to the U.S. market as goods originating from Singapore are guaranteed duty-free access with no quantitative restrictions or prohibitions, provided the rules of origin are met. It has been estimated that there would be a tariff saving of US$200 million a year from this agreement, which only accounts for less than 1 per cent of Singapore's GDP and a processing fee saving of S$51 million annually. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,878
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle