MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100521391 · doi:10.1355/ae20-2f

U.S.–Singapore Free Trade Agreement:: Implications for ASEAN

2003· article· en· W2100521391 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jose L. Tongzon

Bibliographic record

VenueAsean Economic Bulletin · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocioeconomic Development in Asia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFree trade agreementInternational economicsInternational tradeEconomicsFree trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The signing of the U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (USSFTA) by the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of Singapore on 8 May 2003 is one of the culminations of Singapore's overall trade initiatives and economic strategy, which involves forging free trade agreements (FTAs) with other countries outside the ASEAN region. The first one was with New Zealand, which was later followed with Australia, while other FTAs are still under negotiations. This particular FTA, however, has caught much attention and has been hailed in the Singapore press as a historic and momentous event because it is the first FTA for the United States with an Asian country. On the other hand, for Singapore FTA means, apart from political considerations, much more in economic terms because of the huge market potential the United States can offer. With a population of 287.7 million and a per capita income of US$36,273, the United States can provide a strong economic stimulus which is badly needed during these times of sluggish regional growth and uncertainties. In fact, the United States has already been the largest export market and the largest source of foreign direct investments for Singapore. However, from the U.S. perspective, Singapore is not as important, as the bulk of U.S. trade is with its neighbouring developed countries such as Canada and Western Europe. This means, however, that there is a large scope for greater flow of exports from Singapore to the U.S. market. The recent FTA can certainly offer economic opportunities for trade-dependent Singapore, but what this means for the ASEAN countries as well as for ASEAN economic integration is not quite straightforward and more difficult to settle. Singapore's pursuit of extra-ASEAN FTAs has long been criticized by some fellow ASEAN members since the start of Singapore's bilateral free trade negotiations. Apart from the criticism that the other ASEAN countries were not adequately consulted by Singapore, these arrangements were seen by some as undermining ASEAN as a preferential trading arrangement. Specifically, it is claimed that these free trade arrangements could be providing Singapore's FTA partners with a back-door entry into the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA). Before addressing these concerns raised by other ASEAN countries, there is a need to explore whether there are direct and indirect benefits that can be derived by other ASEAN countries from the newly signed USSFTA. It has been argued that there could be beneficial spillover effects of Singapore's extra-ASEAN FTAs in terms of local and foreign investments for the ASEAN region. This argument is quite convincing if we recognize that Singapore does not have an unlimited capacity to absorb all of the investments that can result from the USSFTA. It is logical to infer that U.S. investors in Singapore tend to engage in third country investment projects, using Singapore as a springboard for further investments in neighbouring countries. It has to be qualified, however, that the spillover effects can only be realized if conditions in the ASEAN countries are conducive for the investors. Further, under the Integrated Sourcing Initiative (ISI) of the Agreement, which allows Singapore to source out some of its information and communications technology (ICT) and medical components from outside Singapore and still qualifies Singapore for the preferential entry into the U.S. market, there is an incentive for local and foreign firms to locate some of their production facilities in the neighbouring ASEAN countries. The USSFTA will certainly provide greater access for Singapore's exports to the U.S. market as goods originating from Singapore are guaranteed duty-free access with no quantitative restrictions or prohibitions, provided the rules of origin are met. It has been estimated that there would be a tariff saving of US$200 million a year from this agreement, which only accounts for less than 1 per cent of Singapore's GDP and a processing fee saving of S$51 million annually. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsean Economic BulletinSame topicSocioeconomic Development in AsiaFrench-language works237,207