MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2102676313 · doi:10.1063/1.3490509

Robert Vivian Pound

2010· article· en· W2102676313 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Horowitz

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhysics Today · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineChemistry
ThématiqueVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPound (networking)ArtPolymer scienceMaterials scienceComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

On the death of Robert Vivian Pound, one colleague remarked, “A great tree has fallen.” Pound died on 12 April 2010 in Belmont, Massachusetts, following a series of strokes. He was instrumental in several discoveries that have had immense consequences for science and our everyday lives. A man of broad interests, he had a humanitarian concern for the beneficial uses of science.Pound was born in Ridgeway, Ontario, Canada, on 16 May 1919. His ancestors had lived in Ontario since the Revolutionary War, when the family—Crown loyalists and Quakers—had crossed the Niagara River into Canada. When he was four, the family moved to Buffalo, New York, where his father taught mathematics and where Pound derived joy from ham radio, mathematics, automobiles, and tinkering with electronics. He attended the University of Buffalo and received a bachelor’s degree in physics in 1941.Directly from college Pound joined the World War II scientific effort at the MIT Radiation Laboratory; he contributed fundamental ideas and inventions essential to the development of radar, among them the broadband Pound stub coaxial support and the microwave cavity-locked Pound stabilizer. He wrote the book—literally—on microwave mixers ( Microwave Mixers, MIT Radiation Laboratory Series, volume 16, McGraw-Hill, 1948).After the war, Pound’s election to the Society of Fellows at Harvard University served as a substitute for a formal PhD. He joined the Harvard faculty in 1948 and remained there for the rest of his career. In 1946 Pound and collaborators Edward Purcell and Henry Torrey adapted the Rad Lab techniques—widely used to this day in radar and communications—to detect nuclear magnetic resonance in condensed matter. Soon NMR became a standard analytical tool in chemistry, biology, and physics, and the “Pound box” marginal oscillator became the standard NMR detector. For the NMR discovery at Harvard, and related work at Stanford University, respective team leaders Purcell and Felix Bloch were awarded the 1952 Nobel Prize in Physics. Further developments in NMR, to which several of Pound’s graduate students contributed, have given medicine the remarkable diagnostic tool now called magnetic resonance imaging. Pound and his collaborators followed their discovery of NMR with studies of nuclear relaxation; that work resulted in the 1950 demonstration of “negative temperature”—their term for an inversion of the Boltzmann energy level populations—in nuclear spin systems. That elegant research led directly to the invention of the maser and laser, for which Charles Townes received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1964. Applications in information technology, communications, and medicine are now part of our culture. In his Nobel speech, Townes referred to the “striking demonstration of population inversion and stimulated emission” by Purcell and Pound.Pound may be most widely recognized for using the Mössbauer effect to make the first accurate terrestrial measurement of the gravitational redshift, in collaboration with his student Glen Rebka. Their experiment constituted the first test of Einstein’s equivalence principle applied to gravity’s effect on electromagnetic radiation near Earth’s surface. It had been widely assumed that such a test was possible only over enormous differences in altitude—for example, from an orbiting satellite—given the magnitude of the effect: a fractional shift of just 1.09 × 10-16 per vertical meter.Pound recognized that the unprecedented narrowness of the recently discovered Mössbauer resonance provided the tool that made such a measurement possible, though hardly easy: The 2.5 × 10-15 fractional shift over the 23-meter height of the Harvard Jefferson Laboratory’s enclosed tower was less than one part in a thousand of the iron-57 resonance line width. (It amused Pound that the same tower had been used by Edwin Hall, of Hall effect fame, who dropped 948 balls for his 1903 Physical Review paper “Do Falling Bodies Move South?”) The pioneering redshift experiment was performed with such elegance, ingenuity, inherent simplicity, and accuracy that it has become a landmark in modern physics. For his accomplishments, Pound received the 1990 National Medal of Science and the 1965 Eddington Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society.Pound loved things that exemplified ingenuity and scientific design, particularly if they defied convention, such as his full-suspension Moulton bicycle and hovercraft Flymo lawnmower. He was passionate about automobiles, especially British ones that complemented his tweed jacket, bow tie, wool trousers, and trimmed moustache.His many graduate students became Pound’s extended family, mentored gently and dined hospitably. Many remember him as the most important influence in their lives and the finest scientist they’ve known. He was unflappable, amused and amusing, always in control, and always ready with a new idea. He loved puzzles, especially those involving mechanisms. I sought his advice when my car made a clicking sound but would not start. “Oh, you have a stuck ring gear in your starter mechanism,” he said, and prescribed the cure: “It’s easy, just grab onto the rear bumper and push the car back and forth. You’ll hear a click when it slips back into place.” We did, and it did.Pound had no social pretense, no sense of station or class. He equally enjoyed conversing with a car mechanic or a colleague—with perhaps a slight preference for the former. In the seventh decade of his life, Pound’s professional contributions shifted toward science and public policy. He was a vigorous trustee of Associated Universities Inc, the organization responsible for the National Radio Astronomy Observatory and, until 1997, Brookhaven National Laboratory.Pound’s hair became silvery white, and he grew a full beard to complement his ever-present moustache. Then one day he shaved the beard off because, while walking through Harvard Yard, someone tried to direct him to a senior citizens event. He reported that decision with a twinkle in his eye. The day after the beard’s abrupt removal he came home, even more delighted, to report that only one person in the physics department had noticed its disappearance. That colleague had stopped him to say, “You look different.” He had asked, “In what way?” His colleague peered at him intently for a few moments and then, smiling with discovery, said, “You grew a moustache!” Pound’s eyes lit up every time he told that story.Robert Vivian PoundPPT|High resolutionI am grateful to John Pound, Robert’s son, for his numerous contributions to this obituary.© 2010 American Institute of Physics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,395
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhysics TodayMême sujetVarious Chemistry Research TopicsTravaux en français237 207