MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102676313 · doi:10.1063/1.3490509

Robert Vivian Pound

2010· article· en· W2102676313 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Horowitz

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Today · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPound (networking)ArtPolymer scienceMaterials scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the death of Robert Vivian Pound, one colleague remarked, “A great tree has fallen.” Pound died on 12 April 2010 in Belmont, Massachusetts, following a series of strokes. He was instrumental in several discoveries that have had immense consequences for science and our everyday lives. A man of broad interests, he had a humanitarian concern for the beneficial uses of science.Pound was born in Ridgeway, Ontario, Canada, on 16 May 1919. His ancestors had lived in Ontario since the Revolutionary War, when the family—Crown loyalists and Quakers—had crossed the Niagara River into Canada. When he was four, the family moved to Buffalo, New York, where his father taught mathematics and where Pound derived joy from ham radio, mathematics, automobiles, and tinkering with electronics. He attended the University of Buffalo and received a bachelor’s degree in physics in 1941.Directly from college Pound joined the World War II scientific effort at the MIT Radiation Laboratory; he contributed fundamental ideas and inventions essential to the development of radar, among them the broadband Pound stub coaxial support and the microwave cavity-locked Pound stabilizer. He wrote the book—literally—on microwave mixers ( Microwave Mixers, MIT Radiation Laboratory Series, volume 16, McGraw-Hill, 1948).After the war, Pound’s election to the Society of Fellows at Harvard University served as a substitute for a formal PhD. He joined the Harvard faculty in 1948 and remained there for the rest of his career. In 1946 Pound and collaborators Edward Purcell and Henry Torrey adapted the Rad Lab techniques—widely used to this day in radar and communications—to detect nuclear magnetic resonance in condensed matter. Soon NMR became a standard analytical tool in chemistry, biology, and physics, and the “Pound box” marginal oscillator became the standard NMR detector. For the NMR discovery at Harvard, and related work at Stanford University, respective team leaders Purcell and Felix Bloch were awarded the 1952 Nobel Prize in Physics. Further developments in NMR, to which several of Pound’s graduate students contributed, have given medicine the remarkable diagnostic tool now called magnetic resonance imaging. Pound and his collaborators followed their discovery of NMR with studies of nuclear relaxation; that work resulted in the 1950 demonstration of “negative temperature”—their term for an inversion of the Boltzmann energy level populations—in nuclear spin systems. That elegant research led directly to the invention of the maser and laser, for which Charles Townes received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1964. Applications in information technology, communications, and medicine are now part of our culture. In his Nobel speech, Townes referred to the “striking demonstration of population inversion and stimulated emission” by Purcell and Pound.Pound may be most widely recognized for using the Mössbauer effect to make the first accurate terrestrial measurement of the gravitational redshift, in collaboration with his student Glen Rebka. Their experiment constituted the first test of Einstein’s equivalence principle applied to gravity’s effect on electromagnetic radiation near Earth’s surface. It had been widely assumed that such a test was possible only over enormous differences in altitude—for example, from an orbiting satellite—given the magnitude of the effect: a fractional shift of just 1.09 × 10-16 per vertical meter.Pound recognized that the unprecedented narrowness of the recently discovered Mössbauer resonance provided the tool that made such a measurement possible, though hardly easy: The 2.5 × 10-15 fractional shift over the 23-meter height of the Harvard Jefferson Laboratory’s enclosed tower was less than one part in a thousand of the iron-57 resonance line width. (It amused Pound that the same tower had been used by Edwin Hall, of Hall effect fame, who dropped 948 balls for his 1903 Physical Review paper “Do Falling Bodies Move South?”) The pioneering redshift experiment was performed with such elegance, ingenuity, inherent simplicity, and accuracy that it has become a landmark in modern physics. For his accomplishments, Pound received the 1990 National Medal of Science and the 1965 Eddington Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society.Pound loved things that exemplified ingenuity and scientific design, particularly if they defied convention, such as his full-suspension Moulton bicycle and hovercraft Flymo lawnmower. He was passionate about automobiles, especially British ones that complemented his tweed jacket, bow tie, wool trousers, and trimmed moustache.His many graduate students became Pound’s extended family, mentored gently and dined hospitably. Many remember him as the most important influence in their lives and the finest scientist they’ve known. He was unflappable, amused and amusing, always in control, and always ready with a new idea. He loved puzzles, especially those involving mechanisms. I sought his advice when my car made a clicking sound but would not start. “Oh, you have a stuck ring gear in your starter mechanism,” he said, and prescribed the cure: “It’s easy, just grab onto the rear bumper and push the car back and forth. You’ll hear a click when it slips back into place.” We did, and it did.Pound had no social pretense, no sense of station or class. He equally enjoyed conversing with a car mechanic or a colleague—with perhaps a slight preference for the former. In the seventh decade of his life, Pound’s professional contributions shifted toward science and public policy. He was a vigorous trustee of Associated Universities Inc, the organization responsible for the National Radio Astronomy Observatory and, until 1997, Brookhaven National Laboratory.Pound’s hair became silvery white, and he grew a full beard to complement his ever-present moustache. Then one day he shaved the beard off because, while walking through Harvard Yard, someone tried to direct him to a senior citizens event. He reported that decision with a twinkle in his eye. The day after the beard’s abrupt removal he came home, even more delighted, to report that only one person in the physics department had noticed its disappearance. That colleague had stopped him to say, “You look different.” He had asked, “In what way?” His colleague peered at him intently for a few moments and then, smiling with discovery, said, “You grew a moustache!” Pound’s eyes lit up every time he told that story.Robert Vivian PoundPPT|High resolutionI am grateful to John Pound, Robert’s son, for his numerous contributions to this obituary.© 2010 American Institute of Physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics TodaySame topicVarious Chemistry Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207