MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2103103374 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.221903

Left ventricular remodelling and the athlete's heart: time to revisit the Morganroth hypothesis

2011· letter· en· W2103103374 sur OpenAlex
Mark J. Haykowsky

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Physiology · 2011
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCardiologyConcentric hypertrophyMedicineMuscle hypertrophyEccentricInternal medicineEndurance trainingDiastoleConcentricLeft ventricular hypertrophyAthletesBlood pressurePhysical therapyMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A widely held belief in sport cardiology is that the pattern of left ventricular (LV) remodelling associated with athletic training depends on the type of physical conditioning performed. This is based on the 1975 echocardiographic study by Morganroth et al. who found that male collegiate endurance trained (runners and swimmers) athletes had increased LV diastolic cavity size and mass with a normal wall thickness (eccentric hypertrophy) compared to age- and sex-matched non-athletic control subjects (Morganroth et al. 1975). In contrast, resistance trained athletes (wrestlers and shot putters) had increased LV wall thickness and mass with normal diastolic cavity size (concentric hypertrophy) compared to controls (Morganroth et al. 1975). The stimulus for physiological eccentric hypertrophy was attributed to the large LV volume loads (diastolic wall stress) present during endurance exercise while the stimulus for concentric hypertrophy was the result of intermittent increases in arterial pressure loading (systolic wall stress) associated with performing a Valsalva manoeuvre during lifting (Morganroth et al. 1975; Morganroth & Maron, 1977). Although evidence supports the acceptance of the ‘Morganroth hypothesis’ for endurance training, uncertainty remains if LV remodelling is an obligatory adaptation with resistance training (Haykowsky et al. 2002; Naylor et al. 2008). In a recent issue of The Journal of Physiology, Spence et al. (2011) report new data that challenge, at least for resistance training, the Morganroth hypothesis. The authors examined the effects of 6 months of endurance training (3 hours per week of walking/jogging/running, n= 10) or resistance training (3 hours per week of Olympic weightlifting and supplemental strength exercises, n= 13) followed by 6 weeks of detraining on LV morphology and function, aerobic fitness, muscle strength and body composition in younger males (mean age: 27 years). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and speckle tracing echocardiography were used to assess LV morphology and function. The paper provides novel information because it is the first to directly compare the two forms of exercise using MRI, which is a much more accurate assessment of cardiac morphology than previously utilized methods (Bellenger, et al. 2000) and because it adopted a within subjects longitudinal approach, which is less affected by the limitations of scaling than previous athletic comparisons. Spence et al. reported that total maximal strength and lean mass were significantly higher after resistance training and detraining compared to baseline with no change in LV morphology and function, or aerobic fitness. In contrast, cardiac MRI derived LV mass and aerobic fitness increased significantly after endurance training and returned towards baseline after detraining. Endurance training also significantly increased LV septal wall thickness and end-diastolic volume (P= 0.05) while posterior wall thickness decreased significantly after detraining. Finally, total lean mass and strength were higher after endurance training with the former returning to baseline after detraining. The LV remodelling pattern observed by Spence et al. after 6 months of endurance training is consistent with that expected based on the Morganroth hypothesis. However, their finding that resistance training did not significantly change LV posterior or interventricular septal wall thickness or mass contradicts the expected effect for this type of exercise based on Morganroth's hypothesis. A reason for this finding is that resistance training may not acutely increase in LV systolic wall stress. Indeed, our research group previously reported that (sub)maximal leg-press exercise performed with a 2–3 s Valsalva manoeuvre was not associated with an alteration in LV end-systolic wall stress in younger healthy males (mean age: 27 years) (Haykowsky et al. 2001). This observation combined with the new cardiac MRI findings by Spence et al. suggests that the four-decade old Morganroth hypothesis with respect to resistance training mediated-LV remodelling needs revisiting.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,072
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,955

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle