MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103103374 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.221903

Left ventricular remodelling and the athlete's heart: time to revisit the Morganroth hypothesis

2011· letter· en· W2103103374 on OpenAlex
Mark J. Haykowsky

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2011
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyConcentric hypertrophyMedicineMuscle hypertrophyEccentricInternal medicineEndurance trainingDiastoleConcentricLeft ventricular hypertrophyAthletesBlood pressurePhysical therapyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A widely held belief in sport cardiology is that the pattern of left ventricular (LV) remodelling associated with athletic training depends on the type of physical conditioning performed. This is based on the 1975 echocardiographic study by Morganroth et al. who found that male collegiate endurance trained (runners and swimmers) athletes had increased LV diastolic cavity size and mass with a normal wall thickness (eccentric hypertrophy) compared to age- and sex-matched non-athletic control subjects (Morganroth et al. 1975). In contrast, resistance trained athletes (wrestlers and shot putters) had increased LV wall thickness and mass with normal diastolic cavity size (concentric hypertrophy) compared to controls (Morganroth et al. 1975). The stimulus for physiological eccentric hypertrophy was attributed to the large LV volume loads (diastolic wall stress) present during endurance exercise while the stimulus for concentric hypertrophy was the result of intermittent increases in arterial pressure loading (systolic wall stress) associated with performing a Valsalva manoeuvre during lifting (Morganroth et al. 1975; Morganroth & Maron, 1977). Although evidence supports the acceptance of the ‘Morganroth hypothesis’ for endurance training, uncertainty remains if LV remodelling is an obligatory adaptation with resistance training (Haykowsky et al. 2002; Naylor et al. 2008). In a recent issue of The Journal of Physiology, Spence et al. (2011) report new data that challenge, at least for resistance training, the Morganroth hypothesis. The authors examined the effects of 6 months of endurance training (3 hours per week of walking/jogging/running, n= 10) or resistance training (3 hours per week of Olympic weightlifting and supplemental strength exercises, n= 13) followed by 6 weeks of detraining on LV morphology and function, aerobic fitness, muscle strength and body composition in younger males (mean age: 27 years). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and speckle tracing echocardiography were used to assess LV morphology and function. The paper provides novel information because it is the first to directly compare the two forms of exercise using MRI, which is a much more accurate assessment of cardiac morphology than previously utilized methods (Bellenger, et al. 2000) and because it adopted a within subjects longitudinal approach, which is less affected by the limitations of scaling than previous athletic comparisons. Spence et al. reported that total maximal strength and lean mass were significantly higher after resistance training and detraining compared to baseline with no change in LV morphology and function, or aerobic fitness. In contrast, cardiac MRI derived LV mass and aerobic fitness increased significantly after endurance training and returned towards baseline after detraining. Endurance training also significantly increased LV septal wall thickness and end-diastolic volume (P= 0.05) while posterior wall thickness decreased significantly after detraining. Finally, total lean mass and strength were higher after endurance training with the former returning to baseline after detraining. The LV remodelling pattern observed by Spence et al. after 6 months of endurance training is consistent with that expected based on the Morganroth hypothesis. However, their finding that resistance training did not significantly change LV posterior or interventricular septal wall thickness or mass contradicts the expected effect for this type of exercise based on Morganroth's hypothesis. A reason for this finding is that resistance training may not acutely increase in LV systolic wall stress. Indeed, our research group previously reported that (sub)maximal leg-press exercise performed with a 2–3 s Valsalva manoeuvre was not associated with an alteration in LV end-systolic wall stress in younger healthy males (mean age: 27 years) (Haykowsky et al. 2001). This observation combined with the new cardiac MRI findings by Spence et al. suggests that the four-decade old Morganroth hypothesis with respect to resistance training mediated-LV remodelling needs revisiting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it