A pediatric surgeon's 35-year experience with pilonidal disease in a Canadian children's hospital
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal surgical management for pilonidal disease in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pediatric surgeon's experience at a Canadian children's hospital over 35 years. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the charts of patients seen and treated from July 1969 to December 2003, inclusive. All patients were evaluated for age, sex, clinical diagnosis, infection, treatment, healing time, complications and results. RESULTS: In all, 121 adolescents with pilonidal disease (64 boys, 57 girls) with a mean age of 15 (range 12-19) years were evaluated at the same children's hospital. The 107 (88%) patients with infection (46% acute) underwent surgery. At operation, all 107 pilonidal cysts were either excised and packed open, marsupialized or excised and closed primarily without drainage under general anesthesia; the operation performed was arbitrarily chosen. Vacuum-assisted closure was not used. All patients received antibiotics. The time for healing after the initial operation in the group whose cysts were excised and packed open was at least twice as long (75 d) as in the other 2 groups (p = 0.031). Disease recurred in 24 (22%) patients, 6 (25%) of whom experienced 2 recurrences. Among the 90 patients in the excised and packed open group, 20 (22%) experienced recurrences and 5 (25%) experienced 2 recurrences. Among the 13 patients in the marsupialized group, 3 (23%) experienced recurrences and 1 (33%) experienced 2 recurrences. Among the 4 patients in the excised and closed primarily without drainage group, 1 (25%) experienced a recurrence and none experienced 2 recurrences (p = 0.12). Each recurrence was smaller than the original. All wounds eventually healed. There were no other complications and no deaths. A multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the type of surgical approach was not predictive of recurrence after controlling for age and sex. CONCLUSION: Age, sex and surgical approach were not predictive of recurrence. From our experience, excision and packing open the wound produced a longer morbidity but offered the same results compared with marsupialization or excision and primary closure without drainage.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».