MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103630876 · doi:10.1503/cjs.028509

A pediatric surgeon's 35-year experience with pilonidal disease in a Canadian children's hospital

2011· article· en· W2103630876 on OpenAlex
Ahmed Nasr

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePilonidal diseaseSurgeryPediatric SurgeonRetrospective cohort studyIntravenous antibioticsIncision and drainagePediatric surgeryAntibioticsAbscessWound healing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal surgical management for pilonidal disease in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a pediatric surgeon's experience at a Canadian children's hospital over 35 years. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the charts of patients seen and treated from July 1969 to December 2003, inclusive. All patients were evaluated for age, sex, clinical diagnosis, infection, treatment, healing time, complications and results. RESULTS: In all, 121 adolescents with pilonidal disease (64 boys, 57 girls) with a mean age of 15 (range 12-19) years were evaluated at the same children's hospital. The 107 (88%) patients with infection (46% acute) underwent surgery. At operation, all 107 pilonidal cysts were either excised and packed open, marsupialized or excised and closed primarily without drainage under general anesthesia; the operation performed was arbitrarily chosen. Vacuum-assisted closure was not used. All patients received antibiotics. The time for healing after the initial operation in the group whose cysts were excised and packed open was at least twice as long (75 d) as in the other 2 groups (p = 0.031). Disease recurred in 24 (22%) patients, 6 (25%) of whom experienced 2 recurrences. Among the 90 patients in the excised and packed open group, 20 (22%) experienced recurrences and 5 (25%) experienced 2 recurrences. Among the 13 patients in the marsupialized group, 3 (23%) experienced recurrences and 1 (33%) experienced 2 recurrences. Among the 4 patients in the excised and closed primarily without drainage group, 1 (25%) experienced a recurrence and none experienced 2 recurrences (p = 0.12). Each recurrence was smaller than the original. All wounds eventually healed. There were no other complications and no deaths. A multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the type of surgical approach was not predictive of recurrence after controlling for age and sex. CONCLUSION: Age, sex and surgical approach were not predictive of recurrence. From our experience, excision and packing open the wound produced a longer morbidity but offered the same results compared with marsupialization or excision and primary closure without drainage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it