MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2105479643 · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2008.00434.x

Challenging times in a challenging world

2008· editorial· en· W2105479643 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Douglas Queen

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Wound Journal · 2008
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueDisaster Response and Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFace (sociological concept)MedicinePerspective (graphical)SociologyVisual artsSocial science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In my first editorial of 2006, I discussed being in Thailand 1 year after the Tsunami. This being my first editorial of 2008 and having recently returned from Thailand, Cambodia and India, I am again inspired to discuss the Tsunami. In particular, I am impressed by the resolve of the Thai people and their rapid recovery from a significant disaster. Indeed, one of our papers in this edition discusses the challenges of dealing with the aftermath of the Tsunami from a wound perspective. Since being in Thailand at the end of 2005, I see significant change and return towards normality. In spite of such a significant event, the Thai people are well mannered, at ease with the world and non aggressive. In fact, they could teach the Western world, how to better live our lives without the daily stresses and strains we all seem to face on a regular basis. That is not to say that the Thai people do not face similar challenges but rather they seem to have a much calmer and equally effective way of dealing with them. The contrast after spending a few days in Mumbai where the city is busy, hectic, loud – a complete overstimulation of the olfactory senses – reminiscent of the stresses and aggression of any large North American or European city – Phuket is a peaceful, tranquil paradise where one can reflect, think, enjoy and realise what is important in one’s daily life. Currently I am working with the World Union of Wound Healing Societies on an initiative relating to the problem of wound-related pain. Returning from vacation and preparing for this editorial got me thinking about the impact of not only the physical aspects of the wound pain (i.e. the pain itself) but also the emotional aspects (the stresses and strains around the pain). Upon reflection my ‘pain’ related to busy airports, cancelled flights, hostile check in staff and being in a city of over 17 million people (50% of the population of Canada!) was certainly more emotional than physical. Although at times, it did feel physical – the power of stress! Being around the Thai people for the majority of my holiday certainly taught me how to be more considerate of others, their feelings and more importantly to be a little bit more tolerant. Reflecting on these past few weeks certainly encourages me to value this approach to life, but how long will this last when I am back in my working environment, dealing with the everyday demands and stresses of Western working practices, including the planning of the upcoming Congress 2008 – probably not that long! But if anything the experience makes me think more about others rather than myself – that is the philosophy of the Thai people. Their generosity of spirit and positive attitude to life is an example to us all. If we are to treat our patients adequately, then we should certainly think more about them and their needs, rather than our own institutional or health care system needs. Please read the paper by Dr Thavat Prasartritha and his colleagues – it is both interesting and inspiring. In a matter of hours, he and his colleagues dealt with more wounds than most clinicians see in many years, even in the busiest of clinics. For me, however, it is not simply about the challenge itself –which he and his colleagues articulate very well – but rather the positive and generous approach to what would challenge us all, even in the Western world. For me the lessons learned certainly include disaster planning, early warning systems for future Tsunamis and unusual wounds in unusual circumstances, but the most positive message of all is that culture, environment and attitude for all involved, both caregiver and patient, can have a very positive impact on the care provided. Food for thought! I congratulate and thank the authors for their valuable contribution to the literature on wounds.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,030
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,073

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,044
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0160,016
Communication savante0,0300,025
Science ouverte0,0030,013
Intégrité de la recherche0,0120,031
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0220,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,424
Écart entre enseignants0,380 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Wound JournalMême sujetDisaster Response and ManagementTravaux en français237 207