Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over the years we have observed that many Chemical Engineering and Engineering Chemistry students when they come into the fourth year one term Capstone Process Design course claim that most of the material is completely new to them. Making allowance for the expectations that students would claim this in any case, we believe that there are many advantages to trying to integrate preceding courses as much as possible with the fourth year design course. What we are proposing is to develop a framework process model using a simulator such as PRO/II, UniSim, or ASPEN that would serve as a thread to link assignments in preceding courses such as heat and mass transfer. This model would then be used as the basis for the Capstone design exercise. Although there are several potential advantages to this such as reducing duplication of effort and having a more cohesive design concept throughout the three years, there are bound to be teething problems. One potential problem is a common understanding of design. There are many concepts as to what Chemical Process Design consists of, which reflects the background and experience of the instructors. What we hope to do is to keep in mind the definitions of Science, Engineering and Technology as stated at the Inaugural CDEN conference by Dr. Tom Brzustowski P.Eng., the president of NSERC. This talk clearly pointed out the difference between Research and Development as well as Design. These are a continuum, Research, particularly speculative research is the least expensive and to a large degree the easiest of the three since there is not often the pressure to achieve a specific outcome. Development on the other hand which is primarily an engineering activity is considerably more expensive and usually has a fixed deliverable. Development is a team effort. There is a direct link between development and design since design cannot take place without the engineering development phase. The design and implementation of an artifact is the most expensive item by far and requires inputs from Economics, Environmental Health and Safety as well as knowledge of the market. We are also aware of increasing demands on our engineering graduates from the two perspectives, the increasing competition on a global basis and the expanding core body of knowledge expectations
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».