MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W211008068

"He Never Harmed an Indian": Ethnographic Consequences of Alexander Mackenzie's Heroic Narrative

2002· article· en· W211008068 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kathleen Venema

Notice bibliographique

RevueMosaic (Winnipeg) · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIdeologyOrientalismNarrativeColonialismPoliticsSociologyEthnographyMemoirLiteratureHistoryAnthropologyArt historyArtLawPolitical scienceArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This close reading of grammatical and narrative forms in Alexander Mackenzie's Voyages from Montreal extends the tradition of colonial analysis to include linguistic analysis. The examination shows how the text's paradigm of heroic crisis resolution is supported by strategic manipulations of narrative elements to produce potently racist ethnography. ********** Working in the tradition of colonial theory that Edward Said's Orientalism inaugurated (Tiffin 159; Griffiths 165; Slemon 193-95), Peter Hulme describes colonial as the sets of questions and assumptions, methods of procedure and analysis, and kinds of writing and imagery, normally separated out into the discrete areas of military strategy, political order, social reform, imaginative literature, personal memoir and so on, by which large parts of the non-European world were produced for Europe (2, emph. Hulme's). Elizabeth Vibert's recent history of Pacific Northwest fur traders' accounts takes a perspective similar to Hulme's, emphasizing that the texts examined reflect European perceptions of colonized peoples (xi). Studies such as Hulme's and Vibert's, explicitly sensitive to the ideological functions of language (Hulme 5; Vibert 5), point to, though they rarely take full advantage of, the resources of critical analysis to demonstrate those ideological functions. Critical analysis, exemplified by the work of Norman Fairclough, Robert Hodge, Robert Hodge and Gunther Kress, Jay L. Lemke, and Glenn Stillar, bases the study of ideology in language on several fundamental claims. Specifically, it treats language as social practice (Lemke 9); it specifies that discourse is available for study only insofar as it leaves traces in texts (Hodge viii); and it adds to traditional linguistics a focus on the ways in which power, social relations, social subjectivity, and intersubjective identity are inscribed in, and negotiated through, the linguistic system (Caldas-Coulthard and Coulthard xi; Fairclough, Language 1-2). According to historian James P. Ronda, North American exploration texts deserve much more attention--given their importance as the powerful, material, bases of Europeans' claims to ownership, control, and, eventually, nation-formation--than they typically receive (146, 162). As a response to Ronda, and to better understand how specific instances of colonial inscribe and negotiate relations of power and identity, I examine in this essay the linguistic structures that characterize Alexander Mackenzie's exploration account. Published in 1801, Mackenzie's Voyages from Montreal [...] through the Continent of North America to the Frozen and Pacific Oceans was widely read by his contemporaries, reviewed in influential journals, and regularly reissued (Lamb 35; Greenfield 15-16). Among its various effects, Voyages from Montreal provoked both Thomas Jefferson and Lord Selkirk, Jefferson to throw his political weight behind the Lewis and Clark expedition (Ronda 148-50), Selkirk to establish the Red River Col ony (Lamb 41; Kelsch 23), which is now Winnipeg, Manitoba. With few exceptions, twentieth-century historians and literary critics continue to attribute canonical, nation building, status to Mackenzie and his allegedly heroic account (Hop wood 29; Daniells, Literary 27; Daniells, Alexander 53; Barratt 43; Gough 4-5, 206, 211). I begin by tracing a history of readers' responses to Mackenzie's text and propose that the heroism that readers typically describe is an effect at least as much of the text's narrative forms and grammatical structures as of transparently heroic events. A two-part analysis supports this claim. In the first part, I demonstrate how the text's characteristic syntactic structures create an urgent sense of time. In the second part, I show how that urgency underpins representations of a heroic narrator; here, I read a specific narrative interlude closely, to demonstrate how key narrative elements are realized grammatically in forms that secure Mackenzie s discursive control over time, manipulate time to amplify the narrator's heroism, and re-manipulate time to produce deeply questionable ethnography. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,535
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMosaic (Winnipeg)Même sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207