MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W211008068

"He Never Harmed an Indian": Ethnographic Consequences of Alexander Mackenzie's Heroic Narrative

2002· article· en· W211008068 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kathleen Venema

Bibliographic record

VenueMosaic (Winnipeg) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyOrientalismNarrativeColonialismPoliticsSociologyEthnographyMemoirLiteratureHistoryAnthropologyArt historyArtLawPolitical scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This close reading of grammatical and narrative forms in Alexander Mackenzie's Voyages from Montreal extends the tradition of colonial analysis to include linguistic analysis. The examination shows how the text's paradigm of heroic crisis resolution is supported by strategic manipulations of narrative elements to produce potently racist ethnography. ********** Working in the tradition of colonial theory that Edward Said's Orientalism inaugurated (Tiffin 159; Griffiths 165; Slemon 193-95), Peter Hulme describes colonial as the sets of questions and assumptions, methods of procedure and analysis, and kinds of writing and imagery, normally separated out into the discrete areas of military strategy, political order, social reform, imaginative literature, personal memoir and so on, by which large parts of the non-European world were produced for Europe (2, emph. Hulme's). Elizabeth Vibert's recent history of Pacific Northwest fur traders' accounts takes a perspective similar to Hulme's, emphasizing that the texts examined reflect European perceptions of colonized peoples (xi). Studies such as Hulme's and Vibert's, explicitly sensitive to the ideological functions of language (Hulme 5; Vibert 5), point to, though they rarely take full advantage of, the resources of critical analysis to demonstrate those ideological functions. Critical analysis, exemplified by the work of Norman Fairclough, Robert Hodge, Robert Hodge and Gunther Kress, Jay L. Lemke, and Glenn Stillar, bases the study of ideology in language on several fundamental claims. Specifically, it treats language as social practice (Lemke 9); it specifies that discourse is available for study only insofar as it leaves traces in texts (Hodge viii); and it adds to traditional linguistics a focus on the ways in which power, social relations, social subjectivity, and intersubjective identity are inscribed in, and negotiated through, the linguistic system (Caldas-Coulthard and Coulthard xi; Fairclough, Language 1-2). According to historian James P. Ronda, North American exploration texts deserve much more attention--given their importance as the powerful, material, bases of Europeans' claims to ownership, control, and, eventually, nation-formation--than they typically receive (146, 162). As a response to Ronda, and to better understand how specific instances of colonial inscribe and negotiate relations of power and identity, I examine in this essay the linguistic structures that characterize Alexander Mackenzie's exploration account. Published in 1801, Mackenzie's Voyages from Montreal [...] through the Continent of North America to the Frozen and Pacific Oceans was widely read by his contemporaries, reviewed in influential journals, and regularly reissued (Lamb 35; Greenfield 15-16). Among its various effects, Voyages from Montreal provoked both Thomas Jefferson and Lord Selkirk, Jefferson to throw his political weight behind the Lewis and Clark expedition (Ronda 148-50), Selkirk to establish the Red River Col ony (Lamb 41; Kelsch 23), which is now Winnipeg, Manitoba. With few exceptions, twentieth-century historians and literary critics continue to attribute canonical, nation building, status to Mackenzie and his allegedly heroic account (Hop wood 29; Daniells, Literary 27; Daniells, Alexander 53; Barratt 43; Gough 4-5, 206, 211). I begin by tracing a history of readers' responses to Mackenzie's text and propose that the heroism that readers typically describe is an effect at least as much of the text's narrative forms and grammatical structures as of transparently heroic events. A two-part analysis supports this claim. In the first part, I demonstrate how the text's characteristic syntactic structures create an urgent sense of time. In the second part, I show how that urgency underpins representations of a heroic narrator; here, I read a specific narrative interlude closely, to demonstrate how key narrative elements are realized grammatically in forms that secure Mackenzie s discursive control over time, manipulate time to amplify the narrator's heroism, and re-manipulate time to produce deeply questionable ethnography. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMosaic (Winnipeg)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207