Becoming an authority on authority control : An annotated bibliography of resources
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Authority control has long been an important part of cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through Name Authority Cooperative Program and Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided. ********** Authority control, long an integral part of cataloging process, has been defined as the process of maintaining consistency in verbal form used to represent an access point in a catalog and further process of showing relationships among names, works, and subjects. (1) It helps provide structure and uniformity to information, which can make it more accessible and valuable to library user. As amount of information available to public continues to expand, effective use of authority control concepts can greatly assist library users by making information more accessible and help catalogers in formulating access points for bibliographic records they prepare for public access. The ongoing development of computer technology over past several decades has made authority control easier and more efficient to implement for many libraries, either as an in-house process or by using a vendor. With development and evolution of authority control and online public access catalogs (OPACs), library users can now be directed automatically from an earlier or alternative form of a name, title, series, or subject to authorized one. While this may appear to be a seamless process for library user, catalogers behind scenes must ensure that authority work is done properly so entire information retrieval process continues to be seen as seamless. Despite importance of authority control, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. A 2002 study of how librarians learned about authority control and authority work was conducted by Mugridge and Furniss, using replies to a four-question survey that they posted on Autocat cataloging and authority control electronic discussion list. (2) The results revealed that of forty-nine survey respondents, majority learned about authority control and authority work on job rather than in library school. The authors further noted that, even when exposed to authority control concepts in library school, some respondents felt they received only a minimal amount of information and perceived a lack of hands-on, practical training in authority work. In their conclusions from survey, Mugridge and Furniss suggested that regional workshops or conferences should be offered as a way for librarians at local level to learn more about authority concepts and practices. They also recommended that library schools review their courses and consider offering courses dedicated to authority work or discussing authority work in detail in advanced cataloging courses. Employers were encouraged to invest in continuing education activities and to allow use of work time for further study. Mugridge and Furniss concluded by stating that librarians responsible for authority work need to keep themselves updated on developments in area through additional reading and education. To further ascertain how authority control is learned, Taylor conducted a survey of 114 people whom she identified as teaching in area of organization of information in schools of library and information science in United States and Canada. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,012 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle