MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2115806329 · doi:10.1093/fs/knq053

The Counts of Laval: Culture, Patronage and Religion in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century France The Counts of Laval: Culture, Patronage and Religion in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century France. By M <scp>alcolm</scp> W <scp>alsby</scp> . Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007. xii + 220 pp., ill. Hb £55.00.

2010· article· en· W2115806329 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Greengrass

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrench Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFifteenthPeriodizationProsopographyShadow (psychology)HistoryLeagueAncient historyClassicsArt historyGenealogy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Lavals were one of the leading noble families of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century western France, with their lands and influence concentrated in eastern Brittany and in Maine. Although their main archives had been carefully assembled at the family seat of Vitré during the sixteenth century, the documentary record was disturbed by the Wars of the League at the end of the century, and many more documents were burnt or plundered during the Revolution. The remainder, however, have been painstakingly reassembled in the Archives départementales de la Mayenne. Taken together with the family papers from the Château des ducs de La Trémoïlle (the inheritors of the Laval patrimony) at Thouars, there is more than enough material for this, the first significant historical study of the family. The work is distinguished first by the thorough assembly and examination of all the surviving and available materials. Secondly, it is unusual in its periodization: by traversing the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, Walsby is able to emphasize important continuities in the way that regional magnate power and landed influence was consolidated through marriage and the development of a large noble affinity. The latter is discussed in the shadow of an extensive prosopography of twelve hundred individuals, some details of which are to be found in the original doctoral thesis from which this book is derived. It would have been useful to have had some discussion of the organization of this database and the principles for including people in it, as the important and interesting second chapter, on ‘the network of affinity’, crucially depends on this resource. Thirdly, Walsby brings out the way in which the Lavals played on their connections at both the independent Breton and French courts in order to cement their own influence, act as mediators between centre and periphery, and create a ‘golden age’ for the Lavals under Guy XVI at the beginning of the sixteenth century. That game changed, however, with the death of Anne de Bretagne in 1513 and the absorption of the duchy into the French kingdom. The change was not immediate, since the Lavals were still important mediators. But the family was progressively less able to meet the ‘new challenges’ that the sixteenth century posed. Walsby demonstrates how, faced with a threat to the demographic stability of the lineage, its leading figures became divided among themselves and were wrong-footed by the divisions of the Reformation. Particularly welcome is his discussion of the dedication that Guyonne and Guy XIX de Laval showed towards the Reformed religion and of the impact Protestantism had on the family's influence and fortune, and his chapter on the Lavals' long-running feud with the Rohan family. Historians of the Reformation often discuss questions of loyalty in somewhat abstract terms, whereas in this well-researched study such questions are placed in the long-term context of the family and its regional significance.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,112
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrench StudiesMême sujetHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisTravaux en français237 207