MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2115806329 · doi:10.1093/fs/knq053

The Counts of Laval: Culture, Patronage and Religion in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century France The Counts of Laval: Culture, Patronage and Religion in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century France. By M <scp>alcolm</scp> W <scp>alsby</scp> . Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007. xii + 220 pp., ill. Hb £55.00.

2010· article· en· W2115806329 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Greengrass

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFifteenthPeriodizationProsopographyShadow (psychology)HistoryLeagueAncient historyClassicsArt historyGenealogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lavals were one of the leading noble families of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century western France, with their lands and influence concentrated in eastern Brittany and in Maine. Although their main archives had been carefully assembled at the family seat of Vitré during the sixteenth century, the documentary record was disturbed by the Wars of the League at the end of the century, and many more documents were burnt or plundered during the Revolution. The remainder, however, have been painstakingly reassembled in the Archives départementales de la Mayenne. Taken together with the family papers from the Château des ducs de La Trémoïlle (the inheritors of the Laval patrimony) at Thouars, there is more than enough material for this, the first significant historical study of the family. The work is distinguished first by the thorough assembly and examination of all the surviving and available materials. Secondly, it is unusual in its periodization: by traversing the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, Walsby is able to emphasize important continuities in the way that regional magnate power and landed influence was consolidated through marriage and the development of a large noble affinity. The latter is discussed in the shadow of an extensive prosopography of twelve hundred individuals, some details of which are to be found in the original doctoral thesis from which this book is derived. It would have been useful to have had some discussion of the organization of this database and the principles for including people in it, as the important and interesting second chapter, on ‘the network of affinity’, crucially depends on this resource. Thirdly, Walsby brings out the way in which the Lavals played on their connections at both the independent Breton and French courts in order to cement their own influence, act as mediators between centre and periphery, and create a ‘golden age’ for the Lavals under Guy XVI at the beginning of the sixteenth century. That game changed, however, with the death of Anne de Bretagne in 1513 and the absorption of the duchy into the French kingdom. The change was not immediate, since the Lavals were still important mediators. But the family was progressively less able to meet the ‘new challenges’ that the sixteenth century posed. Walsby demonstrates how, faced with a threat to the demographic stability of the lineage, its leading figures became divided among themselves and were wrong-footed by the divisions of the Reformation. Particularly welcome is his discussion of the dedication that Guyonne and Guy XIX de Laval showed towards the Reformed religion and of the impact Protestantism had on the family's influence and fortune, and his chapter on the Lavals' long-running feud with the Rohan family. Historians of the Reformation often discuss questions of loyalty in somewhat abstract terms, whereas in this well-researched study such questions are placed in the long-term context of the family and its regional significance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207