MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2119941182 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.10167

Guidelines for the management of castrate-resistant prostate cancer

2010· article· en· W2119941182 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityUniversité de Montréal
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProstateCancerMedicineProstate cancerGynecologyUrologyOncologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

DefinitionCastrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is defined by disease progression despite androgen depletion therapy (ADT) and may present as either a continuous rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, the progression of preexisting disease, and/or the appearance of new metastases.Advanced prostate cancer has been known under a number of names over the years, including hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) and androgen-insensitive prostate cancer (AIPC).Most recently, the terms CRPC or castration recurrent prostate cancer were introduced with the realization that intracrine/paracrine androgen production plays is significant in the resistant of prostate cancer cells to testosterone suppression therapy. 1 In their second publication, the Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) defined CRPC as a continuum on the basis of whether metastases are detectable (clinically or by imaging) and whether the serum testosterone is in the castrate range by a surgical orchidectomy or medical therapy. 2 This continuum creates a clinical-states model where patients can be classified.The rising PSA states (castrate and noncastrate) signify that no detectable (measurable or non-measurable) disease has ever been found.The clinical metastases states (castrate and noncastrate) signify that disease was detectable at some point in the past, regardless of whether it is detectable now.Prognosis is associated with several factors, including performance status, presence of bone pain, extent of disease on bone scan and serum alkaline phosphatase levels.Bone metastases will occur in 90% of men with CRPC and can produce significant morbidity, including pain, pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression and bone marrow failure.Paraneoplastic effects are also common, including anemia, weight loss, fatigue, hypercoagulability and increased susceptibility to infection.CRPC presents a spectrum of disease ranging from patients without metastases or symptoms with rising PSA levels despite ADT, to patients with metastases and significant debilitation due to cancer symptoms. Management of CRPC Secondary hormonal manipulations In patients who develop CRPC and who are relatively asymptomatic, secondary hormonal treatments may be attempted. Level 2 Evidence, Grade C recommendationTo date, no study of secondary hormone treatment has demonstrated benefits in terms of survival, but most trials have been smaller and heavily confounded by the future treatments used.In patients treated with luteinizing-hormonereleasing hormone agonist monotherapy or who have had an orchidectomy, total androgen blockade (TAB) with testosterone antagonists, such as bicalutamide, can offer PSA responses in 30% to 35% of patients.For patients who progress on ADT without evidence of distant metastases, it is suggested to screen them for bone metastases and to monitor them for visceral metastases/progression with abdomen and chest imaging.Exact timing of imaging may be modulated using PSA doubling time.Imaging techniques most commonly used include nuclear bone scans and abdominal computed tomography and chest X-ray.The role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography is still unclear.For patients who have undergone TAB, the antiandrogen could be discontinued to exclude an antiandrogen withdrawal response (AAWD).The introduction or changes of an AA or the use of ketoconazole has been reported to have transient PSA reductions in about 30% of patients. 3Level 3 Evidence, Grade C recommendation Because the androgen receptor remains active in most patients who have developed castration resistant disease, it is recommended by groups, such as ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology), NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network), CCO (Cancer Care Ontario) and others, that ADT should be continued.Level 3 Evidence, Grade C recommendation Systemic corticosteroid therapy Corticosteroid therapy with low-dose prednisone or dexamethasone may also offer improvements in PSA values and/ cua guideline

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,255
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,389

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle