MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119941182 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.10167

Guidelines for the management of castrate-resistant prostate cancer

2010· article· en· W2119941182 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Fred Saad, Sebastién J. Hotte

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstateCancerMedicineProstate cancerGynecologyUrologyOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DefinitionCastrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is defined by disease progression despite androgen depletion therapy (ADT) and may present as either a continuous rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, the progression of preexisting disease, and/or the appearance of new metastases.Advanced prostate cancer has been known under a number of names over the years, including hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) and androgen-insensitive prostate cancer (AIPC).Most recently, the terms CRPC or castration recurrent prostate cancer were introduced with the realization that intracrine/paracrine androgen production plays is significant in the resistant of prostate cancer cells to testosterone suppression therapy. 1 In their second publication, the Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) defined CRPC as a continuum on the basis of whether metastases are detectable (clinically or by imaging) and whether the serum testosterone is in the castrate range by a surgical orchidectomy or medical therapy. 2 This continuum creates a clinical-states model where patients can be classified.The rising PSA states (castrate and noncastrate) signify that no detectable (measurable or non-measurable) disease has ever been found.The clinical metastases states (castrate and noncastrate) signify that disease was detectable at some point in the past, regardless of whether it is detectable now.Prognosis is associated with several factors, including performance status, presence of bone pain, extent of disease on bone scan and serum alkaline phosphatase levels.Bone metastases will occur in 90% of men with CRPC and can produce significant morbidity, including pain, pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression and bone marrow failure.Paraneoplastic effects are also common, including anemia, weight loss, fatigue, hypercoagulability and increased susceptibility to infection.CRPC presents a spectrum of disease ranging from patients without metastases or symptoms with rising PSA levels despite ADT, to patients with metastases and significant debilitation due to cancer symptoms. Management of CRPC Secondary hormonal manipulations In patients who develop CRPC and who are relatively asymptomatic, secondary hormonal treatments may be attempted. Level 2 Evidence, Grade C recommendationTo date, no study of secondary hormone treatment has demonstrated benefits in terms of survival, but most trials have been smaller and heavily confounded by the future treatments used.In patients treated with luteinizing-hormonereleasing hormone agonist monotherapy or who have had an orchidectomy, total androgen blockade (TAB) with testosterone antagonists, such as bicalutamide, can offer PSA responses in 30% to 35% of patients.For patients who progress on ADT without evidence of distant metastases, it is suggested to screen them for bone metastases and to monitor them for visceral metastases/progression with abdomen and chest imaging.Exact timing of imaging may be modulated using PSA doubling time.Imaging techniques most commonly used include nuclear bone scans and abdominal computed tomography and chest X-ray.The role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography is still unclear.For patients who have undergone TAB, the antiandrogen could be discontinued to exclude an antiandrogen withdrawal response (AAWD).The introduction or changes of an AA or the use of ketoconazole has been reported to have transient PSA reductions in about 30% of patients. 3Level 3 Evidence, Grade C recommendation Because the androgen receptor remains active in most patients who have developed castration resistant disease, it is recommended by groups, such as ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology), NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network), CCO (Cancer Care Ontario) and others, that ADT should be continued.Level 3 Evidence, Grade C recommendation Systemic corticosteroid therapy Corticosteroid therapy with low-dose prednisone or dexamethasone may also offer improvements in PSA values and/ cua guideline

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations179
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207