Silent subtype 3 pituitary adenoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of the Mayo Clinic experience
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Macroadenomas represent 50% of pituitary tumours and are often (30%) nonfunctioning. Their immunophenotype suggests differentiation toward a specific pituitary cell line. A substantial proportion of tumours with particularly aggressive behaviour are so called 'silent subtype 3 adenoma'. Its diagnosis requires ultrastructural confirmation. Although once included among silent corticotroph adenomas, this aggressive, morphologically distinctive tumour is now recognized as a major form of plurihormonal adenoma and, in fact, some patients might present with clinical hormonal excess. The cytogenesis and pathobiology of silent subtype 3 adenomas is unsettled. OBJECTIVE: We undertook a systematic clinicopathologic examination of the Mayo Clinic experience with this poorly understood tumour. DESIGN: This retrospective, single institution study found 27 confirmed examples of silent subtype 3 adenoma, a frequency of 0.9% of adenomas. Despite histologic and immunophenotypic variation, their ultrastructural features were diagnostic and the sole basis for case inclusion. RESULTS: The study group was comprised of 16 men (59%) and 11 women (41%); two patients (7%) had definitive diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Three tumours (11%) were discovered incidentally. Nine patients each (38%) presented with headaches or visual field loss. Endocrine hyperfunction was noted in eight cases (30%), including GH excess in five (19%) and clinically significant PRL elevation in three (11%). Hypogonadism was noted in 17 cases (63%) and growth arrest in one (4%). All tumours were macroadenomas; 16 (60%) showed radiographic evidence of invasion. Most tumours were plurihormonal, featuring immunoreactivity for PRL (17), GH (15), TSH (16) or ACTH (3); only one lesion was immunonegative. Although a gross total resection was achieved in 19 cases (70%), re-operation for recurrence(s) was required in seven of these (37%). Follow-up (mean, 69 months) showed a high (59%) rate of persistent or recurrent of tumour. Overall, 14 patients (54%) underwent radiotherapy after surgical treatment: three patients (12%) for substantial residual tumour, eight (31%) as adjuvant therapy and three (12%) for tumour regrowth. CONCLUSION: Silent subtype 3 adenoma, a plurihormonal tumour, is rare and aggressive in nature. This adenoma must be considered in the differential of often clinically nonfunctioning but plurihormonal adenomas featuring variable cytologic atypia. Electron microscopy is required for confirmation of the diagnosis. The cytogenesis of silent subtype 3 adenoma remains unsettled.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle